Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar challenged his suspension dated 14 May 2026, alleging that no disciplinary inquiry, charge‑sheet or inquiry officer had been appointed. Respondents produced the charge‑sheet dated 8‑11 August 2026 and stated that an enquiry officer was appointed under Rule 33 of the Uttar …
Suresh Kumar Bharti, a law officer in the Varanasi Development Authority, challenged a disciplinary order that stopped two salary increments, alleging that the procedure violated principles of natural justice under the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. The …
The appellant, an Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, faced disciplinary proceedings in 2012 for major penalties. The Disciplinary Authority imposed a censure entry and stoppage of two grade increments with cumulative effect. The appellant challenged this before the State Public Services …
The respondent, a government engineer, was charged with misconduct and suspended. He repeatedly requested copies of documents relied upon in the charge‑sheet, but the department failed to provide them, violating Rule 7(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. …
