Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15 judgments · newest first · showing 1–15
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the NOIDA Authority and related officials to demolish an unauthorised construction on Plot D‑07, Sector 40, Noida, and to restrain further violations of the sanctioned building plan. They also requested inspection, measurement, and enforcement …
The petitioner, Swapnil Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority not to interfere with his peaceful possession of a house in Bulandshahr. The petitioner argued that the Authority's demolition …
The Supreme Court examined the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Earth Infrastructures Limited (EIL) and whether the lease‑hold lands held by its subsidiaries could be treated as assets of the corporate debtor. The Court found that the subsidiaries were merely fronts for EIL, which …
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. (NTBCL) against a High Court order that halted toll collection on the Delhi‑NOIDA Direct Flyway (DND Flyway). The dispute arose from a 1997 Concession Agreement granting NTBCL the right to build, operate and collect tolls, which …
The petitioners OCL India Ltd., SAIL and Hindalco challenged the levy of entry tax under the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 (and similar statutes in Uttar Pradesh) on the ground that industrial townships, which had been excluded from municipal limits by notifications under the proviso to Article 243Q, …
The Supreme Court considered appeals concerning the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The resolution plan submitted by NBCC (India) Ltd. was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with a 97.36% …
Home buyers booked flats in various projects of the Amrapali Group of companies in Noida and Greater Noida, paying substantial amounts between 2010-2014. The builders failed to deliver possession within the promised 36 months and did not pay dues to the Noida and Greater Noida Authorities or repay …
Canara Bank paid interest on fixed deposits to the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) without deducting tax at source under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer treated the bank as a defaulter and issued a demand notice, which the bank appealed, relying on …
Rajesh Projects entered a 90‑year lease with the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) and paid an upfront lease premium plus annual lease rent. The Income‑Tax Department issued notices for non‑deduction of tax at source (TDS) under Section 194‑I on the lease rent, the company …
The MGR Industries Association, whose members operate in an area declared as an industrial development area under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, challenged a tax demand by the Zila Panchayat under the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961, …
Two cooperative housing societies, Sarvpriya Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd. (registered 1981) and Shivalik Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd. (registered 1982), purchased land that was later declared an industrial development area under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, forming part of …
The Supreme Court examined the cancellation of leases and allotments of commercial plots in Noida granted to hotel developers under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 and the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. It held that a lease governed by a statute can …
The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) acquired land belonging to several cooperative societies and, as per its policy, was to allot 40% of the acquired land to the societies' members. The Kendriya Karamchari Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti claimed ownership of 292 bighas, provided a …
The appellants challenged the acquisition of about 496 acres of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming the land was "abadi" and therefore exempt under Uttar Pradesh's policy not to acquire village settlements. The Supreme Court in Om Prakash v. State of U.P. directed that the parties …
The New Okhla Development Area Authority (NOIDA), constituted under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, announced LIG‑EWS and MIG housing schemes and later reserved a percentage of houses for various categories, including land‑acquired persons, entrepreneurs, NOIDA employees, …
