Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921

9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9

AKHILESH RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Akhilesh Rana challenged an order dated 27 June 2015 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Ghaziabad, on the ground that the appellate authority had not properly considered the representation filed on 11 May 2015, particularly the points raised in paragraph 5(2) and (3). …

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORSversusRACHNA HILLS & ORS.

2023 INSC 441Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged the appointment of three teachers in two minority colleges, arguing that the selection process was not complete because the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) had not approved the proposals before the amendment of Regulation 17. The colleges contended that …

CHANDRA MOHAN VARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 70Dismissed

Chandra Mohan Varma, a Professor of Cardiology in a Uttar Pradesh government medical college, retired on attaining the age of 60 on 13 August 2014. He was granted a ‘session ending benefit’ extending his service until 30 June 2015 under a Government Order dated 19 November 2012. While he was on this …

SURENDRA SINGH BENIWALversusHUKAM SINGH & ORS

2009 INSC 595Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a lecturer who, after voluntarily transferring from one intermediate college to another, claimed that his seniority should be based on his original appointment date, placing him above a colleague already serving at the receiving college. The High Court had set aside the single …

NAGAR MAHAPALIKA KANPURversusSMT. VIBHA SHUKLA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 646Appeal(s) allowed

Vibha Shukla, a sports teacher, was appointed on a temporary basis under the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Adhiniyam, 1959, with successive extensions before being terminated in 1980. She challenged the termination and sought regularisation of her services under section 16(GG) of the Uttar …

KIRAN GUPTA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.

2000 INSC 468Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 and Rule 12(3) of the 1995 Rules, which prescribe selection of principals and headmasters solely by interview. The appellants challenged the …

SUDAMA SINGHversusNATH SARAN SINGH & ORS.

1987 INSC 333Appeal(s) allowed

Sudama Singh and Nath Saran Singh were both appointed as Assistant Teachers in 1967 and later promoted on an ad‑hoc basis to Lecturers. The Uttar Pradesh Education Laws Amendment Act, 1977 introduced section 16GG, which regularised such ad‑hoc teachers by deeming them substantively appointed with …

INDER PAL GUPTAversusTHE MANAGING COMMITTEE, MODEL INTER COLLEGE, THORA

1984 INSC 102Appeal(s) allowed

Inder Pal Gupta was appointed as principal of Model Inter College, Thora on probation in 1967, with the probation period later extended by one year. In April 1969 the Managing Committee, citing a manager’s report, resolved to terminate his services and, with the District Inspector’s approval, issued …