CHANDRA BHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS
2025 INSC 76322 May 2025
The appellant, a successful bidder for sand mining, was issued a demand notice requiring a deposit of 10% of the total bid amount with the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) Trust. The appellant challenged the notice, arguing that Section 9B of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, limited the p…
KALPNATH SINGHversusUDAI NATH & ORS.
2010 INSC 49711 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant applied for a sand mining lease under the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, and was recommended for grant by the District Magistrate and State Government. The respondent, a member of a socially and educationally backward class (SEBC), claimed preference under clause (e) of Rule 9(2) a…
M/S. SOM DATT BUILDERS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 12259 November 2009Dismissed
The petitioners, Som Datt Builders Ltd. and others, challenged the Central Government's notification declaring "ordinary earth" used for filling and levelling as a "minor mineral" under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and the subsequent fixing of royalty at Rs.4 per cubic …
PREM NATH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
1997 INSC 3959 April 1997Dismissed
Prem Nath Sharma, who held a mining lease for a granite unit under the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, saw his lease expire on 31 March 1995. The District Magistrate (DM) issued a notice on 31 March 1995 under Rule 72(ii) inviting applications for a fresh lease, specifying 2 May 1995 as the date …