Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioner, Brij Mohan Parihar, had an agreement with the Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (MPSRTC) to operate his bus as a nominee on a specific route for five years ending in 1982, after which he was allowed to ply on a monthly basis under temporary permits. When the route was …
The petitioners, private stage‑carriage operators, sought renewal of authorisations to ply over common sectors of routes that had been nationalised in the 1950s. Although a "practice" had developed allowing such operators to run over these sectors provided they did not pick up or set down …
The Supreme Court examined the validity of a transport scheme prepared by the Uttar Pradesh State Transport Undertaking under sections 68C (draft scheme) and 68D (approved scheme) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The scheme did not specify the exact number of services (buses, trips) to be provided, …
