Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusPRADHAN SANGH KSHETIRA SAMITI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 21024 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of several provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (as amended in 1994) after the State of U.P. and others challenged the High Court's finding that definitions of 'village', 'Gram Sabha' and 'panchayat area' were ultra vires Articles 243(g), 243(b) and 24

DR. K. KRISHNA MURTHY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2010 INSC 30711 May 2010Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Articles 243‑O(4), 243‑O(6), 243‑T(4) and 243‑T(6) inserted by the 73rd and 74th Amendments, arguing that reservations of chairperson posts and of seats for backward classes in Panchayats and Municipalities violated equality, democracy and the basic structure. T

V.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD.versusDY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

2000 INSC 547 February 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned three plots (Nos. 1366‑1368) in Maliyana village, Meerut, which were used as land appurtenant to the staff quarters of Jaswant Sugar Mill (later V.P. State Sugar Corporation). Dewa Ram, the predecessor‑in‑interest of the respondents, claimed sirdari rights based on a lease executed by the Chairman

MGR INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1053 February 2017Dismissed

The MGR Industries Association, whose members operate in an area declared as an industrial development area under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, challenged a tax demand by the Zila Panchayat under the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961, claiming exemption under

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search