Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 83418 May 2009Dismissed

Santosh Kumar Dubey filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after his father, a constable, went missing in 1981 and was later deemed dead under Section 108 of the Evidence Act. The High Court had earlier granted service benefits to his mother but dismissed the petition for appointment. The appellant a

GENERAL MANAGER, UTTARANCHAL JAL SANSTHANversusLAXMI DEVI AND OTHERS.

2009 INSC 83215 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The husband and father of the petitioners were daily‑wage workers in the Uttar Pradesh Jal Sansthan who died while in service. Their dependents sought compassionate appointments under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974. The High Court directed the department

DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (SECONDARY) AND ANR.versusPUSHPENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS

1998 INSC 23413 May 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned dependents of teaching and non‑teaching staff of non‑government aided schools in Uttar Pradesh who, after the death of the employee, applied for compassionate appointment under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The District Inspector appointed them to Class IV posts, but the applicants filed

HIRA MANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 6038 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a class‑IV employee, was promoted to the post of clerk in a government‑aided college. Respondent No. 4, the son of a government servant who died in service, claimed a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 and sought

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search