Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
165 judgments · newest first · showing 1–165
Yadveer Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on plots 340 and 341 (recorded as Rasta and Pond) in Nagla Khagi village, Auraiya district. The respondents' standing counsel raised a …
The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to provide drainage facilities and repair an encroached old nala in Village Berkhera Chauhan to prevent disease. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.395 (Chakroad) in Village Bhojpurava, Prayagraj. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …
Petitioner Jay Pratap Ram filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to remove encroachments on Gaon Sabha land (Gata no.278). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove an illegal encroachment of Nahar Ki Patri from land belonging to respondent No.10 in Jamunipur village, Prayagraj district. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy …
The applicant, Smt. Rajja Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Avinash Singh Yadav, willfully defied a May 1 2025 order directing him to decide a 2020 land‑revenue case within three months. The original writ (Writ‑C No. 12509 of 2025) had mandated the …
Petitioner Hari Shankar Mishra filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial‑1st) Varanasi to decide Revision No. 2330 of 2025 (Computer Case C‑202514000002330) under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act read with Section 210 of the Uttar …
The petitioner, a corporator of Nagar Nigam Prayagraj, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to correct a revenue record entry and to remove an encroachment on the land. The petitioner claimed to have repeatedly written to the respondents, the State of U.P. and five others, …
Sudha Tiwari filed a PIL seeking a court order directing the State of U.P. (respondent no. 4) to remove illegal encroachments on two revenue plots in Jaunpur. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove encroachments on plot No.200, recorded as Banjar land in Sharifpur village, Prayagraj. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, …
Ranveer Singh filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to take preventive measures to protect specific agricultural land in Padham village and to evict trespassers. The respondents, through their standing counsel, argued that the petitioner …
Shiv Bachan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Phulpur, Azamgarh to decide a restoration/recall application filed on 6 May 2026, which arose after an ex‑parte order dated 5 July 2025 in a partition suit under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner, Deepak Solanki, filed a restoration application on 24‑12‑2025 seeking to recall an ex parte order dated 18‑12‑2025 that had been passed in Revision No. 1395 of 2023 under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The application remained pending before the Additional …
The petitioners, Meera and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tahsildar of Tehsil Phulpur, District Azamgarh, to decide a pending mutation case (No. 3525/2022) filed on 3 June 2022 under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition argued that …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Arazi No. 249, Mauza Donwar, recorded as a road in the revenue records. The petitioner relied on RC Forms 19 & 20 issued under Rule 67 of the Uttar …
Shiv Sahay Singh filed a PIL seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove illegal encroachments on plot No. 522 (Chakmarg) in Basantpatti, Varanasi. The respondent's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 …
Ramjeet filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the removal of encroachments on several revenue‑recorded plots in Village Jaswal, Sant Kabir Nagar. The respondent’s standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the …
Dharma Devi filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove illegal encroachments on a plot of pasture land (Plot No.100Kha) in Village Ram Gadh Kothari, Allahabad district. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an …
The petitioner, Ramalakh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on plot no.351 (Naveen Parti) in Village Aura, Jaunpur. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, …
The petitioners sought a direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ghazipur to decide a revision filed under Section 48(1) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act concerning land in Arazi No.103. The revision arose after the respondent No.4 approved the petitioners' application for restoration …
The petitioner, Anant Bahadur Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 15 April 2026 passed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy by filing an …
Charan Singh filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State to act against several respondents for illegal encroachment on a 0.2180 hectare plot in Ballia. The State's standing counsel objected, arguing that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner, Mukhtiyar Haider Rizvi, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and other respondents to dispose of a pending representation and to demarcate a specific parcel of land. The petitioner alleged that an application for demarcation had been filed but no action …
Swami Charan filed a PIL seeking a court order directing the removal of an illegal encroachment on plot No.94 (Chakmarg) in Village Ghilauva, Jalaun. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing the …
Dr. Huma Narjis Fathima and another filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the District Magistrate/Collector, Smt. Medha Roopam, willfully defied the order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Writ‑C No. 40788/2025 which directed recovery of certain dues and required filing of an …
Mithilesh Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to halt and remove illegal encroachments on public utility land in Jaunpur district. The petition alleged that respondents 5 and 6 had constructed structures on …
Umesh Chandra Tripathi filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an encroachment by respondent No. 6 on plot No. 46 (Sector Road) in Village Tadwa Khurd, Gorakhpur. The petition alleged that respondent No. 4, a local authority, should be ordered to ensure the removal. …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam and four others, claimed peaceful possession of a 0.114‑hectare plot (Arazi No.151M) in Saurai Khurd, Uttar Pradesh, and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the land until the disposal of their appeal under Section 38(1) …
Petitioner Rajpati Gaur filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove encroachments and illegal constructions on a pathway recorded as "Banjar" in the revenue records of Village Bagdaha Hawasabad. The respondents' standing counsel raised …
Kishun Dev filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to evict illegal encroachments on a public road in Ahirauli Lala, Deoria. The petition alleged that respondents 6‑8 were occupying 0.160 hectare of road land. The respondents’ standing counsel argued that …
Baburam Thakur filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.131 in Village Baraitha, Deoria. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No. 91‑Ka (0.3870 hectare) in Mauja Kharaujha, Chandauli. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …
Om Prakash filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on specific village lands. The petitioners argued that the encroachments violated land records and demanded immediate court …
The petitioners obtained a decree in their favour in Civil Suit No. 101 of 1984, which was upheld by the High Court in 2002. Subsequent applications under Sections 33/39 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, were allowed on 08.01.2024, but the Tehsildar later recalled this order on 30.03.2024, …
Maya Devi filed a writ petition along with three other petitioners seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide her application filed on 15 May 2025 under Section 76 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners numbered 2, 3 and 4 withdrew their participation, and …
The petitioner, Mahilal, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Dadri, to conclude demarcation proceedings and decide case No. 15293 of 2025 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the proceeding had …
M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. filed a writ petition under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.3) to decide a pending partition suit (Case No. 44493/2025) and to restrain private respondents from altering the disputed land. …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.1033 in Village Kushaliya, Ghaziabad. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State to demarcate specific land plots in Bareilly district. They claimed the court had previously ordered the Tehsildar to act, but no demarcation had occurred. The State contended that the petitioners had not …
Petitioner Major Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an eviction order dated 8 May 2026 passed by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 209(Ja) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and seeking a mandamus directing the officer to accept his restoration …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on three revenue‑recorded plots in Village Parwa, Ghazipur. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 266 (Naveen Parti) in Village Dalpatpur, Azamgarh. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 341 in Jaunpur district. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing the recent Amaruddin …
Petitioners Deenanath and two others filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on specific land parcels in Village Bhendawa, Basti district. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Atul Kumar Kushwaha, filed a PIL seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plots 384 and 3855, designated as public utility land, by invoking Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others, contended …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on several plots of land designated as public utility in Payagpur village, Prayagraj district. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 306, which is recorded as public utility land in Deoria district, Uttar Pradesh. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 140 in Village Sameda, Azamgarh. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing earlier …
The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plots 733 and 738 in Village Jagdishpur, Uttar Pradesh. The respondents contended that the petitioner has a specific statutory remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
Petitioner Jitendra Kumar Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Meja, Prayagraj, to decide an application dated 26‑05‑2026, which was merely a reminder sent by registered post. The application is filed under Section 24 of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Etah to decide a suit filed on 31‑01‑2026 under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain status quo over certain lands. The petition also requested an order for an interim injunction …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Banda to decide an objection filed on 11 March 2024 in a revenue proceeding under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The objection relates to a case concerning land parcels in Village Bhawanipurwa, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Administration (Gorakhpur) to decide appeal No. 657/2026 under Section 207 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since April 4, 2026. The petitioner alleged undue delay and …
The petitioners Mahendra Kumar and others filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 20‑06‑2022 passed by the Sub‑Collector under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in a revenue case initiated in 2018. They argued that the initial decree was one‑sided and should be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3, a Sub‑Judge, to expedite the disposal of civil suit No. 9784/2024 (Horizon Rai v. Satish Kumar) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They alleged that the lower court had delayed the case …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar Pandey filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on land recorded as Banjar (Khalihan) in the revenue records of Mauja Majhauwa, Madhuban, District Mau. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and 16 others, contested the …
The Bhartiya Kisan Union Lokshakti filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing revenue authorities to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several plots recorded as public utility land in Kanpur Dehat. The respondents, including the Secretary of the Land Revenue‑Finance …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Chaurasiya, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Belthara Road, Ballia, to decide his pending mutation case (No.4064/2025) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the mutation proceeding, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Mirzapur to decide an application filed on 22 April 2026 under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, for measurement and demarcation of specific land parcels. The petition alleged that the …
The petitioner, Sona Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to demarcate plot no. 693 belonging to the Gaon Sabha and to remove the illegal possession of private respondent No.5, and also to order respondents No.2 and No.3 to decide an application …
The petitioner, Razia @ Dularia, claimed Panika Scheduled‑Tribe status by birth and sought to quash revenue orders that declared several of her land purchase deeds void. The revenue authority held the deeds void under Section 157‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, …
The petitioner, Nanhki @ Naimunnisha, claimed Scheduled Tribe status and purchased agricultural land in Sonbhadra district, asserting that the sale deeds were valid and she remained in possession. The Deputy Collector declared the deeds void under Section 157‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari …
The petitioners sought mandamus directing the revenue authorities to record their names in a lease agricultural land record and to decide a pending representation. The State's standing counsel objected, stating that the petitioners must first file an application under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar …
Reena Devi filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate to inquire into, and the Gaon Sabha to correct, certain revenue entries that allegedly recorded respondent No.5’s name as owner of pond and banjar lands without any legal basis. The petitioner claimed that …
The petitioner, Mohammad Razzak, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the fourth respondent to decide a pending criminal case (State vs. Peer Mohammad, case No. 03289/2020) that arose under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner, Gaya Lal, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the fourth respondent to decide a pending case (No. 15815/2026) involving Gaon Sabha and alleged illegal encroachers, which is being heard under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Deena Nath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authority to record his name on a land plot in accordance with a final decree in a suit filed under Section 229‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The decree had been passed by …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Nizamabad and the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to enforce an order dated 11‑May‑2026 in a land‑holding division suit under Section 176 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The order had …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Collector of Mau to decide a pending restoration/recall application and a revenue case under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application was subsequently allowed, leaving only the revenue …
The petitioners Diwas Kasana and Ravindra Shivamani filed writ petitions seeking a direction to implement an order dated 29 January 2026 of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue, issued under Section 80 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They claimed that the required fee under sub‑section (9) of Section …
Ashok Kumar Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Badlapur to decide a revenue case (Case No. 6174 of 2026) under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 within three months and to ensure that all proceedings are recorded and signed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide a suit for division of holding filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 15 May 2023. The petitioner argued that the …
Petitioner Shalini Chaurasiya filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar (respondent No.2) to decide a pending revenue suit (Suit No. 12618/2025) filed in August 2025 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that …
The applicant, Nasirullah, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with a High Court order dated 30 July 2024, which dismissed a revision against an interlocutory order in proceedings under Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The original order …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the eviction of respondents 6‑10 who had re‑encroached on public utility land comprising plot no. 182 (recorded as Pond) and plot no. 66 (recorded as Bheeta) in Mirza Adampur, Azamgarh. The respondents had previously been ordered by the …
The petitioner, Suryapal Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to take legal action against encroachers on Gaon Sabha land in Basti district. The respondents, including the State, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy …
Jitendra Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an illegal encroachment on 0.38 hectare of land in Bansai village, Mathura. The petition alleged that the encroachment violated revenue laws and demanded …
The petitioner, Sacchidanand Maurya, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel certain respondents to remove an obstruction on a public path located on plots 133 and 134 in Banpokhara, Mau district, and to register the matter under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh …
Sunil Das filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the removal of an illegal encroachment on a public pathway (Arazi No. 487) in Deoria district. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, contended that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under …
Ramnaresh Tripathi filed a PIL seeking a court order directing certain respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No. 326, recorded as a nala in the revenue records of Gadola Bangar, Banda district. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to preserve plots 378 and 380, recorded as Banjar, and to evict private allottees occupying them. The respondents argued that two orders under Section 123(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on several revenue‑recorded plots in Village Sultanpur, Dadri Tehsil. The court noted that the Tehsildar had already initiated proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
The petitioners, represented by Ajai Kumar and Ravindra Pratap Singh, filed a PIL seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No. 436, recorded as Chak Road in Village Bairiparwan, District Bhadohi. The respondents raised a …
Ghanshyam Kunwar filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing authorities to remove encroachments on two plots recorded as a manure pit and a khalihan in Kaushambi district. The Court noted that a earlier writ petition (Writ B No.10874 of 1997) concerning a different plot was pending, but the plots in …
The petitioner, Prem Chandra Patel, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State and other respondents to vacate an alleged illegal encroachment on Gram Sabha land (Arazi No. 531) in Prayagraj. The Court examined an instruction from the Deputy District Magistrate …
The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Jitendra Yadav after the Court had earlier, in a PIL, directed the petitioner to approach the Assistant Collector under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 to have illegal encroachments on Gaon Sabha land removed. The …
The petitioner, Yashoda Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Naib-Tehsildar in a revenue case and also sought a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb her peaceful possession. The respondents raised a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, to decide a stay application dated 04-04-2026 filed in Revision No. C 202602000000593 under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They contended that the stay application had been …
The petitioner, Mahesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and mandamus directing the District Magistrate to conduct a fresh spot inspection and demarcation of his land. The court noted that the petitioner’s grievance pertains to land …
Petitioners Girjashankar Pal and another filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a revenue inspector's report and mandamus orders to prevent blockage of a historic pathway and to compel a decision on an application. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative …
The petition filed by Sitaram Jaiswal sought a writ directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several parcels of land recorded as Usar in the revenue records of Molwa Kala village, Prayagraj. The petitioner relied on a public‑interest …
The petitioner, Gyaneshwar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 18‑12‑2025 passed by respondent No.2 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an …
Petitioner Guddi Devi (Shakeela) filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Commissioner of Prayagraj Mandal to hear and decide a pending appeal (appeal No. 1138/2024) that has been delayed since 2024. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had been fixed but the appeal remained …
The petitioners filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to remove encroachments on a pond situated on plot no. 198 in Kathuwa village, Prayagraj. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative remedy under …
The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Deoria to decide a restoration application filed in 2022 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the Tehsildar had not …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and other respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on public utility land in Mahua Kheda village, Agra. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute an eviction order dated 18‑06‑2024 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been confirmed by the Collector. The petitioners alleged that the order had not been …
The petitioner, Azeezurrahman, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State authorities to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Gata No. 234, recorded as Pokhari land in Hengaipur, Azamgarh, and to protect the public‑utility land from further …
The petitioner, Ravi Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking an interim mandamus directing the State respondents to demolish an alleged illegal encroachment of about 7 Bigha 6 Biswa by respondent no.6, invoking Sections 67(2) and 67(6) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State's standing …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26‑10‑2023 passed by respondent No.3 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an appeal under …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking an order directing the State and other respondents to remove private encroachments on two land plots in Samodhpur village, Jaunpur. The Court noted that the petitioner has a specific remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment by private respondents on a pond plot (0.0770 hectare) in Village Bagai Mutalka Banhara, Azamgarh. The court noted an instruction dated 02.01.2026 from the Tehsildar, Sagadi, indicating that …
The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Shamra, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the removal of an alleged illegal encroachment by respondents 5‑8 on Plot No.75 (0.0310 hectare) recorded as Goole (Naali) in the revenue records of Village Dhilvari, Budaun. The High Court noted …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Upadhyay, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce an order dated 22 May 2024 that ordered removal of illegal encroachments under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to remove private constructions on land recorded as Navin Parti in the revenue records. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Judicial Mandal, Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 2468 of 2022) filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2022 …
Amarjeet and three others filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the dumping of polluted water by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents into local water bodies at Dharampur Kasayar. The petitioners alleged that the dumping caused environmental harm and …
The petitioners, Deena Nath Mishra and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 26 July 2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) in Appeal No. 991 of 2024 (Mehilal v. Deenath) under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 16383 of 2026) challenging a notice issued to him in proceedings under Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition sought relief on the ground that the notice was unlawful. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioner, Parasuram, filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus to remove a public toilet encroaching on a primary school and a Panchayat Bhawan encroaching on a Khalihan, and to recover damages from responsible authorities. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State and other respondents to vest land (Arazi No. 254, Village Sijwaha, Jhansi) in the Gaon Sabha, alleging that the sale deed to non‑Scheduled Caste purchasers was void for lacking …
Petitioner Dalip Singh filed a PIL seeking a court order to remove an alleged illegal possession of 0.570 hectare of Potter's Clay land in Village Sahara, Agra. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Pandey filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on two parcels of land in Daulatnpur, Basti. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on land (Gata No. 1066) in Jaunpur district. The respondents, through their standing counsel, raised …
The petitioner, Gyanesh Kumar Bind, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Plot No. 507, which is registered as a hospital. The petition alleged that respondents No. 6 to 13 …
Manoj Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to take legal action to vacate a disputed land parcel (plot no. 294) in Varanasi. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh …
Anand Kumar Mishra filed a PIL seeking writs of mandamus directing certain respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on specific village lands in Prayagraj district. The court noted that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, …
Shivbabu filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to act against private parties for removing an alleged illegal encroachment on land recorded as public utility land in Prayagraj district. The petition argued that the encroachment violated …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authority to consider and decide applications filed on 06.01.2022 and 24.06.2022 for implementing an order dated 16.11.2021 passed under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Bhullan, filed Writ Petition No. 17720 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 16 May 2025 issued by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector (2nd) (Judicial) of Tehsil Loni, District Ghaziabad, under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments by private respondents on plots 147 and 148 (Nali and Chakmarg) in Village Chakudhan, Tehsil Karhal, District Mainpuri. The standing counsel for the State highlighted that two cases …
The petitioner, Babloo, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26-10-2023 passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State, represented by its standing counsel, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy—specifically, filing a restoration application or …
Petitioner Lavkush filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Mirzapur, to decide a pending case (No. 28093/2025) under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2025. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had …
Manoj Kumar Shukla filed a PIL seeking mandamus directing the respondents to enforce earlier orders restraining construction and to decide applications alleging illegal construction on reserve land. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …
The petitioner, Krishan Kanhaiya, filed a writ petition under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the respondent (Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata) to decide a pending mutation case (No. 6825 of 2025) that had been delayed since 2025 despite several dates …
The petitioner, Sukhveer Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to remove an illegal encroachment on public utility land (Khasra No.100) and to enforce an eviction and damages order dated 16 November 2015 against …
The petitioner, Mumtaj Ahmad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an encroachment on a 0.081 hectare Banjar land parcel in Kushinagar district. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner …
Sohan Ram filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain state officials to initiate legal action against a third party for removal of an encroachment on public utility land in Azamgarh. The petition alleged that the encroachment, recorded as Gata No.342, occupied …
The petitioner Virendra filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2 April 2026 that was issued under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. raised a preliminary objection that the impugned order is appealable under Section 67(5) of the same Code. The …
The petitioner, Mahendra Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authority to decide a pending mutation case (No.19215 of 2025) before the Tehsildar of Dumariyaganj. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case …
Indrajeet filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State officials (respondents 2 and 3) to initiate proceedings under sections 136 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 against alleged encroachers on a Banjar land parcel in Jaunpur. The respondents' …
Mithilesh Kumar Shukla filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on public utility land (Arazi Nos. 15‑17) in Dharupur, Prayagraj. The respondents raised a preliminary objection …
The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a pending restoration application filed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and also sought a direction restraining Respondent No.4 from interfering with peaceful possession …
Panelal Kushwaha filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to remove an encroachment on Gata No. 385 (0.0160 hectare) in Lakhuwa Lakhui, Kushinagar. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
Narendra Kumar filed a PIL seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to act against a fourth respondent for removing an illegal encroachment on Plot No. 535, recorded as banjar land in Basti district. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an alternative …
Vikash Kumar Pal filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to remove illegal encroachments on a 0.0160 hectare plot in Jaunpur. The petition argued that the respondents had constructed on the land without authority. The respondents contended that the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment by private respondent No.6 on two plots in Village Amhawa Khas, Siddharth Nagar. The court noted that the revenue authorities had already removed the partial encroachment and that the plots …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel authorities to remove illegal encroachments by respondents 5‑7 on land earmarked for an Anganwadi Center in Kaushambi district. The petition alleged that the encroachments would adversely affect …
The petitioner, Satyendra Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several parcels of public land in Ghazipur district. The respondents contested the petition, and the Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kerakat, under Section 209(J) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2005, and also requested an interim mandamus to prevent any interference with his peaceful possession of land. …
Alham Siddiqui filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of U.P. officials (respondents 2‑4) to take legal action against a third party (respondent 6) for removing an illegal encroachment on a 0.51‑hectare land parcel in Kaptanganj, Uttar Pradesh. The Court noted that the petitioner …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to restrain respondents from constructing a temple over an Anganwadi Kendra in Shikohpur, Baghpat. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the removal of illegal encroachments by respondents 6 and 7 on a 0.607‑hectare pond (Gata No.217) in Barahi Sahora village, Budaun. The Court noted earlier orders granting time to the standing counsel, which were not utilized. It relied on a Division Bench …
Shiv Pratap Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his application concerning encroachments on a village chakroad over plots 316 and 314. The petitioner alleged that tenure‑holders and a respondent had built structures on the chakroad, …
Brahmdev Upadhayay filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus against certain officials to remove illegal encroachments on garhi (water‑logged) land in Siddharth Nagar. The petition alleged that two individuals had occupied the land and asked the court to order its restoration. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a pending case (Shyamdev v. Gaon Sabha) under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2024 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the …
Arvind Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to expedite the pending case No. 10830 of 2025, which is filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained undecided …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Sadar Jaunpur to decide a restoration application dated 14‑06‑2019, which had remained pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petition alleged undue delay and prayed for an …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove unauthorized encroachments on public utility land in Tambeen village, Chitrakoot district. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner could instead file an application …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to protect their land (Gata No. 33) in Kaushambi district and to stop illegal construction by other respondents. The court observed that the dispute was essentially between private parties and not a matter of …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2‑5 to act against respondent 6 for an alleged illegal encroachment on a 386‑hectare plot in Azamgarh. The court noted that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, as …
Sudama filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an ex‑parte order dated 09‑12‑2025 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Administration‑IVth, Gorakhpur under Section 24(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and a prohibition restraining interference with …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to act on his application dated 22-12-2025 and to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on his land, also seeking compensation for damages. The State argued that the dispute was private and …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and local authorities to remove alleged illegal encroachments by private parties on three parcels of Gaon Sabha land in Mau district. The State responded that ten cases under Section 67(1) of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land recorded as road and banjar land in Prayagraj and to compel the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 16-12-2025. The Court directed the parties to obtain instructions, …
The petitioner, Prahlad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to investigate and remove an alleged illegal and forged entry on Gram Sabha land in Village Semari, Mirzapur, which was recorded as Banjar. He alleged that villagers, in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Tehsildar, Tehsil and District of Deoria to decide a mutation case (Case No. 7799 of 2021) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the time limits prescribed by sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar …
Petitioner Chandrapal filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to decide a revenue case (Case No.8565 of 2025) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code within the prescribed time. The High Court examined the petition …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land in Mau district. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel argued that the matter had already been concluded under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and that the …
Deenanath filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402541) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner contended that an inordinate amount of time had …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of encroachments on several plots of land in Chandauli district. The State submitted an affidavit showing that the revenue authorities had already set aside a 1997 order, restored the plots to their original category, and …
The High Court noted that in Writ‑C No. 18326/2023 it had directed the opposite party to decide proceedings under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 1 October 2024 stating that the required proceedings were concluded on 27 September …
The appellant Suvej Singh challenged a High Court order that had set aside earlier revenue authority decisions and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of a map correction application filed by the private respondents after a 17‑year gap. The private respondents had previously sought …
Jitendra Singh, a resident of village Saini, challenged the allotment of two village ponds (recorded as ‘pokhar’ in revenue records) to private industrialist Sharp Enterprises by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA). The ponds had been leased to Sharp in 2012, but GNIDA relied …
Maharaji Educational Trust, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and HUDCO appealed against a Lucknow High Court order that directed the Parishad to demarcate 42.45 acres of mortgaged land and to declare 21 acres as unencumbered, based on a sale agreement with SGS Construction. The Supreme Court held that …
