Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Arazi No. 249, Mauza Donwar, recorded as a road in the revenue records. The petitioner relied on RC Forms 19 & 20 issued under Rule 67 of the Uttar …
Anil Chandra Tripathi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue to decide Revision No. 1644 of 2019 within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that the revision, filed by respondent No. 5, has been pending since 2019 despite the petitioner …
Petitioner Saif Ahmad filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent, a revenue officer, to decide Second Appeal No. 2356 of 2024 (Rama Shankar et al. v. Ijhaar Ahmad et al.) pending under Section 331 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Revenue Act. The appeal had been admitted on …
Reena Devi filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate to inquire into, and the Gaon Sabha to correct, certain revenue entries that allegedly recorded respondent No.5’s name as owner of pond and banjar lands without any legal basis. The petitioner claimed that …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the eviction of respondents 6‑10 who had re‑encroached on public utility land comprising plot no. 182 (recorded as Pond) and plot no. 66 (recorded as Bheeta) in Mirza Adampur, Azamgarh. The respondents had previously been ordered by the …
The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Jitendra Yadav after the Court had earlier, in a PIL, directed the petitioner to approach the Assistant Collector under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 to have illegal encroachments on Gaon Sabha land removed. The …
Petitioner Prabhunath Prasad filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to call records of two cases and decide them based on an earlier decree and a consolidation order. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Rule …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Judicial Mandal, Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 2468 of 2022) filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2022 …
Petitioner Kailash Babu filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to decide a stay application filed on 29 September 2025 in Revision No.4815 of 2025. The revision, accompanied by the stay, has remained pending for over six months without any hearing, and the respondent has not …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Tehsildar, Tehsil and District of Deoria to decide a mutation case (Case No. 7799 of 2021) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the time limits prescribed by sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar …
