Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioner sought re‑installation of demarcation pillars that had been installed under an order passed pursuant to Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code on 06‑06‑2022, but were later removed by private individuals, leading to an FIR and a final report. The petitioner applied to the …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to delete its name from the revenue record for Plot No. 161 (2.90 acres) and to record the petitioners' name. The respondents argued that the entry had already been rectified and that the petitioners must follow the procedure laid down in …
The petitioner challenged the order dated 23.03.2026 that stayed a prior order allowing his substitution in a revenue proceeding before the Deputy District Magistrate, Siddharthnagar. The petitioner argued that the substitution order was merely interim, did not determine any substantive right, and …
The petitioners, Dhanraji Devi and others, filed Writ C No. 7771 of 2026 challenging an order obtained by private respondent Jeet Narayan Singh, alleging concealment of facts in a prior judgment dated 10.07.2025 (Writ C No. 20929 of 2025). The order was being used by revenue authorities to initiate …
