Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

U.P. STATE SUGAR & CANE DEVELOPMENT LTD.versusRAZA BULAND SUGAR CO.LTD. AND ORS

2009 INSC 54717 April 2009Disposed off

The case concerned the interpretation of clause (vi) of Section 2(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971, which defines a "scheduled undertaking" to include certain lands and buildings. Raza Buland Sugar Co. sought a declaration that several properties listed in its plaint were not covered b

STATE OF U.P.versusM/S LAKSHMI SUGAR & OIL MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

2013 INSC 61112 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over a parcel of land (described as "Parti Kadim Tilla") claimed by M/s Lakshmi Sugar & Oil Mills Ltd. to be agricultural and therefore exempt from acquisition under the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971. Consolidation authorities had concurrently found that t

U.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.versusSANT RAJ SINGH & ORS.

2006 INSC 33512 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a supervisory‑B employee of a sugar mill who, after the mill was nationalised under the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971, sought to be placed in the corporation’s higher pay scale that was being paid to two other employees – one whose higher pay was protected under Section 16

DIWAN SUGAR MILLS AND ORS.versusSTAIB OF U.P. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 2813 May 2000Dismissed

Diwan Sugar Mills, a partnership that owned a sugar factory leased to Diwan Sugar and General Mills (Pvt) Ltd., claimed Rs 12 lakhs as compensation under Section 7(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971, arguing that no deductions should be made for liabilities of the lessee. The Prescribed

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search