Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The tenant Ramesh Chand sought to enforce the landlord's promise to provide a new shop at reasonable rent and alternative accommodation after demolition of the existing premises. The landlord had obtained permission to file an eviction suit under the 1947 U.P. Rent Act, giving an …
The tenant Tej Bhan, who had attorned his tenancy to Gopinath Agrawal and later to Chhaya Gupta, refused to attorn again and challenged the landlord's title, alleging defects in the original sale to Gopinath. The Supreme Court examined whether such a denial amounted to a denial of the landlord's …
The landlord obtained a decree for eviction of the tenant's shop, with the trial court ordering each party to bear its own costs. While the appeal was pending, the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 came into force, requiring a tenant to deposit the …
Ram Sewak, a tenant, was sued for eviction by his landlord Munna Lal under Section 3(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 for non‑payment of rent for more than three months. The tenant claimed that he had tendered the rent, which the landlord refused to …
