Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1956

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF U.P. (NOW UTTARAKHAND)versusRABINDRA SINGH

2009 INSC 62327 April 2009Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh (now Uttarakhand) appealed against a High Court order that had allowed the writ petition of Rabindra Singh, who occupied a 4.10‑bigha plot of agricultural land. The central question was whether land covered by Section 3(14) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 f

SMT. FIRDOSH FATIMA (SINCE DEAD) ETC.versusSMT. FIRDOSH BEGUM (DEAD) AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 1906 February 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Amendment Act 33 of 1972, which abolished letters‑patent appeals from judgments of a single High Court judge in writ jurisdiction concerning revenue and tenancy matters. The petitioners challenged the amendment on the ground that i

RAJESHWAR DAYAL AND ORS.versusAVNEESH KUMAR AVASTHI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 1844 April 2002Dismissed

The Lala Nanak Chand Trust leased a plot in Meerut to trustee Bateshwar Dayal for 30 years with a renewal clause. After the lease expired, the Trust sued for possession and obtained a decree; the lessee’s heirs later sought specific performance of the renewal clause, but their suit was dismissed as time‑barred. While t

MAHANT DOOJ DAS (DEAD) THROUGH LR.versusUDASIN PANCHAYATI BARA AKHARA & ANR.

2008 INSC 5691 May 2008Case Allowed

The plaintiff, Mahant Dooj Das (deceased) through legal representatives, sued to declare title and cancel a sale deed concerning lands he claimed as heir and successor of Mahant Tahal Dass. The defendants argued that the lands were agricultural areas demarcated under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition an

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search