Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

CHANDRA PRAKASH MISHRAversusFLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2022 INSC 37030 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax), challenged the High Court's observations and cost orders that accused him of deliberate, malafide actions in passing ex‑parte provisional assessment orders against Flipkart India Private Limited under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act. The High Court had set asid

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2019 INSC 54822 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged demand notices for interest on entry tax levied under the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007, arguing that the Act contained no substantive provision for interest and that the High Court’s dismissal of its writ petition was barred by res

NEHA ENTERPRISESversusCOMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX, LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH

2025 INSC 4768 April 2025Dismissed

Neha Enterprises, a registered dealer under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, claimed an input tax credit of Rs. 6,42,260 for purchases related to sales made to a manufacturer‑exporter under Form‑E for the assessment year 2010‑11. The assessing officer initially allowed the credit but later disallowed it und

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX UP

2023 INSC 9746 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Modi Naturals Ltd., a registered dealer of rice bran oil in Uttar Pradesh, claimed full input tax credit (ITC) on tax paid for raw rice bran used to manufacture taxable oil and a by‑product (de‑oiled rice bran, an exempt good). The Revenue argued that under Section 13(1)(f) of the UP VAT Act the ITC should be limited t

THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P., LUCKNOWversusS/S RUJHAN STUDIO

2021 INSC 1382 March 2021Disposed off

The Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P. appealed against the classification of unstitched ladies' suits sold by S/S Rujhan Studio. The studio purchased bulk textile, cut it to suit dimensions, performed limited embroidery and 'peco' work, and sold the items as unstitched suits. The issue was whether these goods qualif

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search