Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Wealth Tax Rules, 1957

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, GHAZIABAD

2014 INSC 97830 June 2014Dismissed

The appellant, Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd., owned a residential flat in Mumbai and declared its value under self‑assessment rules (Rule 3‑7) of Schedule III of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Assessing Officer (AO) found a large disparity between the declared value and the market value estimated by the Departmental Valuatio

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, HYDERABADversusTRUSTEES OF HEH

2003 INSC 23216 April 2003Dismissed

The beneficiaries of the H.E.H. Nizam Jewellery Trust valued their interest in the trust's jewellery based on a valuer's report. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax challenged this valuation, arguing that the estate duty payable on the deemed death of the life tenant had been incorrectly deducted, among other objections. Th

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXversusPRINCE MUFFAKHAM JAH BAHADUR CHAMLIJAN

2000 INSC 58412 December 2000Appeal(s) allowed

Prince Muffakham Jah, a beneficiary of a trust created by the late Nizam, was entitled to reside rent‑free for life in a house built by the trustees. He omitted the value of this life interest from his wealth‑tax returns for assessment years 1969‑70 to 1977‑78. The Wealth‑Tax Officer added the value using Rule 1B of th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search