STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSAILENDRA NATH SEN
1993 INSC 16322 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal challenged the High Court’s view that auction sales of raiyati interests, made in execution of rent decrees under the Bengal Tenancy Act, could be treated as sales under the Code of Civil Procedure and thus be valid. The Assistant Settlement Officer had revised the record of rights, substitutin…
THE MANIPUR TEA CO. PVT. LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF HAILAKANDI
1996 INSC 148113 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Manipur Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. challenged the compensation awarded for 123 Bighas of its tea estate acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for railway construction. The Supreme Court examined whether sale statistics and three sale deeds relating to agricultural land could be used to determine compensation for tea…
ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.versusSHIBU BODHAK & ORS.
2018 INSC 3065 April 2018Dismissed
The appellant, Ashim Ranjan Das, purchased land that had earlier been transferred to two patta holders, Shibu Bodhak and Tapan Malik, after a series of proceedings under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953. The Revenue Officer had earlier cancelled tenancy rights under Section 44(2a), but that order was set as…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSUBURBAN AGRICULTURE DAIRY & FISHERIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
1993 INSC 1773 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal sought to vest an estate and its tank fisheries in the State under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953, extinguishing the rights of intermediaries. The respondents, who held lease‑hold rights to the tank fisheries, filed a writ petition to restrain the vesting and to retain possession.…
M/S. TANDON BROTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
2001 INSC 1903 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Mis. Tandon Brothers, owned the Rohini Tea Estate and was served a notice under Section 6(3) of the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953, declaring 1,451.40 acres surplus. After a long delay, the State issued a second notice superseding the first and sought possession of a larger area, prompting the …
SUSHANTA TAGORE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 1173 March 2005Disposed off
The petitioners, residents of Santiniketan, filed a public interest litigation seeking to restrain the construction of residential and commercial complexes, especially on the ecologically sensitive 'Khoai' area, alleging violation of the Visva‑Bharati Act, 1951 and directions of the West Bengal Pollution Control Board.…