STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSINGELL TEA AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ORS.
1993 INSC 13531 March 1993Disposed off
The State of West Bengal issued a notification under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 covering the tea garden of Singell Tea and Agricultural Industries Ltd., and the Revenue Officer assessed rent. The company contended it was not an intermediary and the land was free‑hold, challenging the officer’s jurisd…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSCENE SCREEN (PVT.) LTD. AND ANR.
2000 INSC 46928 September 2000Dismissed
The petitioner, an heir who inherited two plots leased to Scene Screen Ltd. for a cinema, filed Form ‘B’ under Section 6 of the West Bengal Estates’ Acquisition Act, 1953, to retain the lands as an intermediary. After the Act came into force, the State began collecting rent directly from the lessee, prompting the petit…
STATE OF WEST BENGALversusATUL KRISHNA SHAW AND ANR.
1990 INSC 25928 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal sought to acquire lands that had been recorded as "tank fisheries" under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The respondents, intermediaries, claimed exemption under Section 6(1)(e) which preserves rights to tank fisheries at the date of vesting. The Assistant Settlement Officer, aft…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusASHIT NATH DAS AND OTHERS
1988 INSC 2627 January 1988Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from suo moto proceedings initiated by a revenue officer under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, which were reopened after a High Court order in 1982. Ashit Nath Das appealed the final order before the 9th Additional District Judge and, after obtaining the opinion of the Ad…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusRATNAGIRI ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2009 INSC 25024 February 2009Disposed off
The State of West Bengal appealed against a Calcutta High Court order that had resumed land held by an intermediary under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The appeals raised three questions: (1) whether the proviso to Section 6(3) of the 1953 Act remains effective after the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1…
BANSILAL FARMS ETC.versusUMARANI BOSE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 137422 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the Nalban Fishery, which was part of a partition suit among members of the Sarkar family. While the suit was pending, the State of West Bengal requisitioned the fishery under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land Requisition and Acquisition Act, 1948, and took possession in 1969. After a compromis…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSRI SRI LAKSHMI JANARDAN THAKUR AND ORS.
2006 INSC 53021 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal initiated proceedings under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 to determine whether the land held by the deity Sri Sri Lakshmi Janardan Thakur constituted a public or private religious endowment. The Revenue Officer and subsequent appellate authorities held the endowment to be public, allow…
UNION OF INDIAversusNIHAR KANTA SEN & ORS.
1987 INSC 12221 April 1987Case Partly allowed
During World War II the Collector requisitioned 199.04 acres of land in Burdwan, West Bengal, for a military aerodrome. The claimants, heirs of the original patni holder, sought compensation for loss of the land, forest, minerals and structures. The High Court awarded Rs.2,00,000 as terminal compensation and Rs.18,74,0…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusKARAN SINGH BINAYAK AND ORS.
2002 INSC 16120 March 2002Dismissed
The State of West Bengal sought to revise a 1957 record of rights concerning land that had been leased to a paper mill, arguing that the land vested in the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The respondents, Karan Singh Binayak and others, had purchased the land and commenced construction after …
BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD.versusPRAMILA SANFUI AND ORS.
2015 INSC 67418 September 2015Disposed off
The West Bengal Housing Board (appellant) purchased a 20.184‑acre plot from the legal heirs of late Gangadas Pal, who were intermediaries under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The heirs had earlier been parties to a partition suit (Title Suit No. 121 of 1962) that was later amended to include the plot, a…
ARDHENDU BHUSAN HALDAR (DEAD) BY L.RS. ETC. ETC.versusSMT. GANGAMONI MONDAL ETC. ETC.
1990 INSC 28918 September 1990Dismissed
The case concerned a dispute over the right of pre-emption under Section 26‑F of the Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885, claimed by a predecessor‑in‑interest who was a co‑sharer of a holding that had earlier vested in the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The respondent had purchased the land in 1963, an…
WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (FOOD AND SUPPLIES) CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS.versusSMT. SULEKHA PAL (DEY) AND ORS.
2003 INSC 23816 April 2003Dismissed
The case concerned lands vested in the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 after the death of an intermediary (big raiyat) Ganga Das Pal. The heirs of the intermediary filed a writ petition challenging a 1971 order that vested the lands in the State, arguing they retained the right to choose lands…
KSHITISH CHANDRA PURKAITversusSANTOSH KUMAR PURKAIT
1997 INSC 4877 May 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff purchased land from Kshirodamani Dasi, who had sole occupancy rights, and sued the defendants for declaration of title and possession. The defendants, after having trespassed on the land, raised a new plea in a second appeal before the Calcutta High Court, claiming that under the West Bengal Estates Acqui…
SMT. GITARANI PAULversusDIBYENDRA KUNDU ALIAS DIBYENDRA KUMAR KUNDU
1990 INSC 3796 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Gitarani Paul purchased land from the Bauries, who were under‑Raiyats, after the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 came into force. She sued Dibyendra Kundu and Dasarathi Dutta for declaration of title and possession, alleging that on 5 June 1960 the defendants, aided by police, destroyed her crops and disturbe…
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CALCUTTAversusSMT. ANJAMLI KHAN
1990 INSC 3406 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax assessed wealth tax on Smt. Anjamli Khan for three assessment years, estimating compensation payable for agricultural lands acquired by the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. Khan contended that the right to receive such compensation was not an "asset" under Sectio…
SAROJ KUMAR BOSEversusKANAILAL MONDAL & ORS.
1985 INSC 1686 August 1985Dismissed
The respondents' predecessor obtained a permanent lease of a tank fishery without sub‑soil in 1914 and later, in 1952, granted an 11‑year lease of the same fishery to the appellant. Under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, the interest of intermediaries was to vest in the State from 15 April 1955. The respo…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusCALCUTTA MINERAL SUPPLY CO. PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER
2015 INSC 3816 May 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined two appeals arising from writ petitions challenging State actions under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 and its Rules. In the first appeal, the Court held that Calcutta Mineral Supply Co. had lawfully retained factory land within the ceiling limit and that the State's resumption…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusJAI HIND PVT. LTD.
2026 INSC 1326 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal sought to overturn a High Court order that allowed Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd. to retain about 211 acres of land under Section 6(1)(j) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The company had previously been denied the benefit because it failed to prove it was exclusively engaged in agricultura…
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusARUN KUMAR BASU AND ANR.
1997 INSC 3734 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed
The respondents, liquidators of the former West Bengal Provincial Company Ltd., challenged the State's acquisition of about 30 miles of land for a railway line, arguing that the vesting under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 did not apply to non‑agricultural land and that the Collector's failure to take po…
STATE OF WEST BENGALversusASHISH KUMAR ROY AND ORS.
2004 INSC 6933 December 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The West Bengal Bar Association challenged the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act, 1997, alleging that its provisions were ultra vires the Constitution because they ousted the High Court's jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227. The Calcutta High Court struck down sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Act, holding…
ABDULLA KABIRversusMD. NASIRUDDIN
1989 INSC 361 February 1989Dismissed
Abdulla Kabir purchased a one‑quarter share in a plot that was recorded in the Record of Rights as a "bari" (homestead) belonging to an agriculturist raiyat. Md. Nasiruddin, claiming to be a co‑sharer, filed an application for pre‑emption under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. The lower courts were …