Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955

21 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusRATNAGIRI ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2009 INSC 25024 February 2009Disposed off

The State of West Bengal appealed against a Calcutta High Court order that had resumed land held by an intermediary under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The appeals raised three questions: (1) whether the proviso to Section 6(3) of the 1953 Act remains effective after the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1

MADHUSDAN SINGH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1983 INSC 18122 November 1983Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 14M, 17(c), 17(1) and 21B of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 as amended by the 1972 and 1977 Amendment Acts, alleging that the amendments were confiscatory, violated Articles 14, 19 and 31C, and were not covered by the Ninth Schedule. The Court e

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSRI SRI LAKSHMI JANARDAN THAKUR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 53021 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal initiated proceedings under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 to determine whether the land held by the deity Sri Sri Lakshmi Janardan Thakur constituted a public or private religious endowment. The Revenue Officer and subsequent appellate authorities held the endowment to be public, allow

SRI SRI KALIMATA THAKURANI & SRI SRI RAGHUNATH JEW & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1981 INSC 4420 February 1981Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 and its amendments of 1972 and 1977, alleging violations of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution and claiming the provisions were arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable. The Court examined whether the Acts, placed in the Ninth Schedule before 24 Ap

ARDHENDU BHUSAN HALDAR (DEAD) BY L.RS. ETC. ETC.versusSMT. GANGAMONI MONDAL ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 28918 September 1990Dismissed

The case concerned a dispute over the right of pre-emption under Section 26‑F of the Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885, claimed by a predecessor‑in‑interest who was a co‑sharer of a holding that had earlier vested in the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The respondent had purchased the land in 1963, an

BARASAT EYE HOSPITAL & ORS.versusKAUSTABH MONDAL

2019 INSC 115517 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased land from a raiyat and the respondent, a contiguous raiyat, claimed a pre‑emptive right under Sections 8 and 9 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, alleging that the sale consideration was inflated. The respondent filed an application with only a partial deposit (the alleged actual consid

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 73317 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants owned agricultural land that was transferred from Bihar to West Bengal under the Bihar and West Bengal (Transferred Territories) Act, 1956, and the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 was extended to the transferred territories. The Calcutta High Court, in a 1984 writ petition, quashed the vesting of the

SRI RAM SAHAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

2004 INSC 60414 October 2004Appeal(s) allowed

Sri Ram Saha, the owner of a private garden (bagan) in West Bengal, sought to fell several old trees affected by worms and replace them with saplings. Local police and the Block Land Reforms Officer stopped him, citing the High Court’s interpretation of Sections 4‑A, 4‑B and 4‑C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 195

WEST BENGAL HOUSING BOARD AND ORS.versusBRIJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5529 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal Housing Board, acting through a joint‑sector company, requisitioned and later acquired 1.82 acres of land to build a housing scheme for low‑ and middle‑income groups. The petitioners, who had purchased the land but whose names were not yet entered in the Record of Rights, claimed that the requisition no

GOPAL SARDARversusKARUNA SARDAR

2004 INSC 1449 March 2004

The Supreme Court examined two civil appeals concerning applications under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 for enforcement of a statutory right of pre‑emption. The respondents claimed that the applications were barred by limitation, while the appellants argued that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1

SRI PRASANTA KUMAR PAL & ORSversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

2025 INSC 7838 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

Iswar Chandra Pal executed a registered gift deed on 7 December 1967 transferring 20.88½ acres to his three sons and three daughters, which was entered in revenue records on 26 May 1969. After the land reforms, 8.80 acres of his remaining holdings were declared surplus and vested in the State. Following the 2nd and 3rd

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusJAI HIND PVT. LTD.

2026 INSC 1326 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal sought to overturn a High Court order that allowed Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd. to retain about 211 acres of land under Section 6(1)(j) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The company had previously been denied the benefit because it failed to prove it was exclusively engaged in agricultura

KARTICK CHANDRA MANDALversusNETAL MONDAL (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2009 INSC 46 January 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title, possession and permanent injunction based on an alleged amicable partition of land among co‑sharers. The High Court, on a second appeal under CPC s.100, decided that the partition, if any, did not occur before the commencement of Section 14 of the West Bengal Land Re

ABDUL MATIN MALLICKversusSUBRATA BHATTACHARJEE (BANERJEE) AND ORS.

2022 INSC 5185 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a pre‑emption claim under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 where three brothers (pre‑emptors) sought to exercise their right of pre‑emption over shares in a plot sold by their sisters to Abdul Matin Mallick (pre‑emptee). The trial court dismissed the claim, but the First Appellate Court allo

ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.versusSHIBU BODHAK & ORS.

2018 INSC 3065 April 2018Dismissed

The appellant, Ashim Ranjan Das, purchased land that had earlier been transferred to two patta holders, Shibu Bodhak and Tapan Malik, after a series of proceedings under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953. The Revenue Officer had earlier cancelled tenancy rights under Section 44(2a), but that order was set as

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusASHISH KUMAR ROY AND ORS.

2004 INSC 6933 December 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal Bar Association challenged the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act, 1997, alleging that its provisions were ultra vires the Constitution because they ousted the High Court's jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227. The Calcutta High Court struck down sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Act, holding

ABDULLA KABIRversusMD. NASIRUDDIN

1989 INSC 361 February 1989Dismissed

Abdulla Kabir purchased a one‑quarter share in a plot that was recorded in the Record of Rights as a "bari" (homestead) belonging to an agriculturist raiyat. Md. Nasiruddin, claiming to be a co‑sharer, filed an application for pre‑emption under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. The lower courts were

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search