Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BARASAT EYE HOSPITAL & ORS.versusKAUSTABH MONDAL

2019 INSC 115517 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased land from a raiyat and the respondent, a contiguous raiyat, claimed a pre‑emptive right under Sections 8 and 9 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, alleging that the sale consideration was inflated. The respondent filed an application with only a partial deposit (the alleged actual consid

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 73317 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants owned agricultural land that was transferred from Bihar to West Bengal under the Bihar and West Bengal (Transferred Territories) Act, 1956, and the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 was extended to the transferred territories. The Calcutta High Court, in a 1984 writ petition, quashed the vesting of the

SRI PRASANTA KUMAR PAL & ORSversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

2025 INSC 7838 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

Iswar Chandra Pal executed a registered gift deed on 7 December 1967 transferring 20.88½ acres to his three sons and three daughters, which was entered in revenue records on 26 May 1969. After the land reforms, 8.80 acres of his remaining holdings were declared surplus and vested in the State. Following the 2nd and 3rd

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusJAI HIND PVT. LTD.

2026 INSC 1326 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal sought to overturn a High Court order that allowed Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd. to retain about 211 acres of land under Section 6(1)(j) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The company had previously been denied the benefit because it failed to prove it was exclusively engaged in agricultura

ABDUL MATIN MALLICKversusSUBRATA BHATTACHARJEE (BANERJEE) AND ORS.

2022 INSC 5185 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a pre‑emption claim under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 where three brothers (pre‑emptors) sought to exercise their right of pre‑emption over shares in a plot sold by their sisters to Abdul Matin Mallick (pre‑emptee). The trial court dismissed the claim, but the First Appellate Court allo

ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.versusSHIBU BODHAK & ORS.

2018 INSC 3065 April 2018Dismissed

The appellant, Ashim Ranjan Das, purchased land that had earlier been transferred to two patta holders, Shibu Bodhak and Tapan Malik, after a series of proceedings under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953. The Revenue Officer had earlier cancelled tenancy rights under Section 44(2a), but that order was set as

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search