Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusPRADIP KUMAR GHOSH & OTHERS

2017 INSC 104524 October 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) appealed against a Division Bench order that quashed its acquisition of a flat requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. The property had been under requisition since 1979 and the High Court, in 1993, directed the Land Acquisi

KEWAL CHAND MIMANI (D) BY LRSversusS.K. SEN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30223 July 2001Dismissed

The appellants, K.L. Mimani and others, had a 50‑year lease of land in Howrah which was requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. Their writ petition challenging the requisition was dismissed and an appeal was filed, but the lease expired by efflux of time during the pendency of

BANSILAL FARMS ETC.versusUMARANI BOSE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 137422 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the Nalban Fishery, which was part of a partition suit among members of the Sarkar family. While the suit was pending, the State of West Bengal requisitioned the fishery under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land Requisition and Acquisition Act, 1948, and took possession in 1969. After a compromis

M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 151619 December 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court, hearing a public‑interest writ filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta, examined the pollution caused by about 550 tanneries in the eastern fringe of Calcutta that were discharging untreated effluent into the River Ganga. The Court found that the tanneries were operating without consent under the

DAULAT SINGH SURANA AND ORS.versusFIRST LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 83813 November 2006Dismissed

The appellant, Daulat Singh Surana, owned premises that had been requisitioned and used by the West Bengal Government since 1943 as the office and residence of the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Security Control). The State issued a notification under Section 4 and a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSAMARENDRA NATH PAUL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5489 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal sought to requisition two plots of land for a housing project under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. The owners challenged the requisition, alleging that the statutory notice was not served as required by Rule 3 of the 1948 Rules, specifically that t

WEST BENGAL HOUSING BOARDversusBHAWAN LAL MUNDHRA AND ORS .

1997 INSC 5499 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal Housing Board sought to acquire 0.63 acres of land belonging to Brijendra Lal Mundhra for a housing project for weaker sections, which included an approach road, market complex, clinic and drainage. The land was requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, and notice

C.E.S.G: LIML1 TEDversusSANDHYA RANI BARIK AND ORS.

2008 INSC 7697 July 2008Disposed off

The case involved the acquisition of more than three bighas of land by CESC Ltd. under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 for an electric sub‑station. The Collector initially awarded Rs.50,000 per cottah, which was later raised by the Land Acquisition Judge to about Rs.5 lakh per cottah. The H

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search