Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusO.P. LODHA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33531 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent firm, M/s Prakash Trading Corporation, sold goods both on its own account and as a commission agent for 24 disclosed principals. The Commercial Tax Officer assessed sales tax under Section 6‑B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 on the firm’s total turnover, including the commission sales. The We

CALCUTTA IRON MERCHANTSversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

1996 INSC 30623 February 1996Disposed off

The case concerned dealers of iron and steel who, under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, were required to transport goods with a declaration signed by the consignor as mandated by Rule 89A(2). The dealers contended that the rule unfairly placed the burden of producing the declaration on them while sellers were

KRISHAN CHANDER DUTIA (SPICE) PVT. LTDversusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1994 INSC 8923 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.C.D. Pvt. Ltd., bought whole black pepper and whole turmeric in West Bengal, ground them into powder, and sold the powder. It argued that under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, the powdered forms are the same goods as the whole forms, already taxed at the first point of sale, and therefore not liab

BHAI JASPAL SINGH AND ANR.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ORS.

2010 INSC 72222 October 2010Dismissed

The appellant, a small‑scale fruit‑processing unit, claimed exemption from West Bengal sales tax on the basis of Notification No. 1428‑FT dated 26‑May‑1994, asserting that its investment in plant and machinery was below Rs.5 lakhs after accounting for depreciation. The assessing authority held that the investment excee

SUN OIL COMPANY (P) LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1998 INSC 37622 September 1998Dismissed

Sun Oil Company Ltd., a registered dealer and small‑scale industry, obtained a certificate under Section 4‑AA of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 exempting it from "tax" for the period 14‑Jan‑1980 to 14‑Jan‑1985. Despite this, the company was assessed a turnover tax under Section 4‑AAA for part of the assessment yea

NIRMAL KUMAR PARSANversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ORS.

2020 INSC 6021 January 2020Dismissed

The appellants imported cigarettes, stored them in a bonded warehouse in West Bengal and sold them to the master of a foreign‑going ship as ship stores without paying customs duty. They claimed the sales were "in the course of import" and therefore exempt from West Bengal sales tax under the 1954 and 1994 Acts. The Cou

CALCUTTA JUTE MANUFACTURING CO. AND ANR.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5328 July 1997Dismissed

The appellants, Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Co. and others, were assessed a turnover tax under Section 6‑B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 after their challenge to the provision’s constitutional validity was rejected. While they paid the tax, the West Bengal government later introduced Section 10‑A imposing

M/S DEVI DASS GOPAL KRISHAN PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 1488 April 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of purchase‑tax provisions in the sales‑tax statutes of Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal and Bombay, which imposed tax on goods purchased for manufacture when the finished goods were dispatched out of the state without a sale. Dealers challenged these provisions on the gro

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search