Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Wildlife Protection Act

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

SHAHAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shaham was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 9(51) of the Wildlife Protection Act in Crime No. 95 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Abdul Gaffar, had …

UTTAMDASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Uttamdas, who is charged under Sections 9, 39, 48, 49(Kha), 50, 51 and 57 of the Wildlife Protection Act for possession of protected tortoises. The applicant …

Oshiyar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Oshiyar Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail in a forest case (Case No. 05 of 2022) involving alleged illegal hunting and trapping of a Nilgai under several sections of the Wildlife Protection Act. The prosecution alleged that co-accused identified the petitioner as participating …