Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 31401–31600

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from a straw house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the straw house does …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sachin Kumar, a 21‑year‑old student, was implicated in a case (Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025) involving alleged assault, extortion and other offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 305, 308(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted a jeweller with an iron …

Raj KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,460.040 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle she owned. She argued that she had no …

Bhola Uraon @ Bhola UranversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Uraon, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the premises involved were joint family property. He argued that the 2018 …

Mistar @ Md. MistarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mistar (Md. Mistar) was implicated in a robbery and assault case (PS Case No.109 of 2025) based on the confession of a co‑accused, Bhanu Pratap, who alleged that Mistar participated in the theft of cash and forced withdrawal from an ATM. The petitioner contended that he was never apprehended at the …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and Bipin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 341, 323, 385, 504, 506, 272, 273) and the Bihar Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, while intoxicated, arrived in a Scorpio …

Bipin Yadav @ Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bipin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case (Jhajha P.S. Case No. 105 of 2021) involving alleged offences of robbery, kidnapping, and assault under various IPC sections. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, along with others, entered …

Nagendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Mahto, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres and 123.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong …

Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving alleged conspiracy to commit vehicle loot and possession of illegal arms. The prosecution’s case is based on the recovery of loaded pistols, live cartridges, and cash from three co-accused, whose …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public Bhagwati Asthan. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong …

Arjun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Kumar applied for bail in a case originally registered under Section 366 of the IPC, later amended to include Section 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, initially reported as 18 years old, was later medically assessed to be 23, indicating she was not a minor and POCSO …

Md. Samir @ Md. Samir Khan @ SanniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Samir Khan, applied for regular bail in a theft case (PS Rahui Case No. 673 of 2024) registered under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that no incriminating material or identification …

Bhaggu Manjhi @ Bhagu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Bhaggu Manjhi, Rakesh Manjhi and Phulo Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 316 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Naresh …

Kamlesh KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kushwaha, was charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the IPC arising from a land‑dispute that led to an assault and the death of the informant’s sister‑in‑law. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the …

Monu Kumar @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Kumar was arrested in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged kidnapping, extortion, assault and related offences. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, forcibly entered the complainant's house, assaulted his wife and demanded a …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Kushar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor and 1000 kg of mahua from a public bush. They argued they …

Naresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 31.875 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his friend …

Pranjal PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pranjal Patel and Nitil Patel, were arrested after 12.5 kg of ganja-like substance was recovered from a motorcycle they were riding. They claimed they were falsely implicated, that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold of 20 kg under the NDPS Act, and that the …

Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …

Raja Kumar Singh @ Raja @ RajuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a theft of approximately 500 LPG cylinders, alleged under IPC sections 461 and 379 and corresponding sections of the Bihar Non‑Commercial Sale Act. The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the …

Ashik Kumar @ Ashik @ Chhotu @ Chhote SarkarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashik Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 399, 402, 414, 120B and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35. The prosecution’s case is based on a raid in which two co‑accused were arrested and, during interrogation, implicated the petitioner, …

Naresh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a gun‑fire incident at a cultural program in Agrahana village. The FIR alleged that his sons, Shravan and Subhash Singh, …

Chand Nadaf @ Md. Chand BabyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Chand Nadaf petitioned for bail in a case (Hayaghat P.S. Case No. 103 of 2023) where he was accused under IPC sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 504 and 506/34 for assault during a family feud. The FIR was lodged after a significant delay, and the allegations against him were described as omnibus. The …

Satish Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Satish Kumar Choudhary sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑fraud case (Rohtas Cyber PS Case No. 49 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 318(4), 303(2), 319(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act, 2008. The prosecution alleged that the …

Dinesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the alleged recovery of 31 litres of liquor and 400 litres …

Md. Taushik @ Md. TausikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Taushik, a 19‑year‑old student, was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 15 live cartridges, a pistol, and Rs.33,000 from his residence, charging him under Section 111(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. …

Vikas Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikas Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant's family that resulted in the father's death. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the allegation against him pertained only to an assault on the informant's brother, while …

Raja YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raja Yadav was arrested on 26 April 2025 after police recovered a country-made pistol and live cartridges from him during a vehicle check, and he allegedly planned a loot of maize. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of independent witnesses, and non‑compliance with Section 105 …

Jitendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jitendra Singh, a bus agent, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of a large cache of illegal lottery tickets recovered from a bus. The FIR charged him under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Lottery Act, alleging that he loaded the tickets on the direction of …

Santosh Yadav @ Sanni SamratversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav was arrested in connection with a dacoity alleged to have been carried out by ten unknown persons, for which he was charged under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and that …

Ajay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 187.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle near Keshav Market. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Arshad @ Arshad HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arshad Hussain was named in an FIR for alleged smuggling of 74.5 kg of ganja under Sections 317(5) BNS and 8/20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The seizure was made from two vehicles, but the petitioner was not apprehended at the scene and no narcotic was found in his possession; his name was recorded …

Sanjay ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sanjay Choudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 15-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Pramod Kumar, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The State, represented by Mr. Abhay Kumar, opposed the …

Viral BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Viral Bhagat and Lagan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in their …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arun Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery during which a finance company's collection agent was assaulted and valuables were stolen. The police allege that Kumar acted as a 'liner' in the robbery and that charas and firearms were recovered from a co-accused's house, leading to charges …

Yogendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Yogendra Thakur and his sons, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 889.2 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the seized …

Uma Shankar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Uma Shankar Singh was arrested in connection with a police raid that recovered two pistols, live and empty cartridges from the roof of his house, leading to charges under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was arrested in connection with FIR No.655 of 2024 alleging assault, attempted rape and related offences under Sections 75(2), 76, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He contended that he is the husband of the informant, that the …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar Yadav was named in a cyber‑crime FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Information Technology Act, based primarily on a confessional statement of a co‑accused and a raid that recovered material from others but not from him. The petitioner contended he …

PANKAJ YADAV @ PANKAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pankaj Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No.19 of 2025) alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant, caused injuries, and stole …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Nitish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dinkar Kumar, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by APP Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, opposed the request. The Court, after hearing both …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving illegal possession of a pistol and cartridges, and was charged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail while the trial is pending, claiming innocence and alleging false …

Manoj Rai @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Rai applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 23.345 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his personal possession, the …

Shatrudhan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Dev Narayan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dev Narayan Mahto, sought bail in a case registered as Madhepur PS Case No.178 of 2025, alleging that the death of the informant's son was an accidental electrocution caused by a naked electric wire in a neighbour's vegetable field, not a murder. The prosecution charged him under …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, the owner of a Hyundai car, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(1) of the Excise Act for the recovery of 750 ml of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Sheikhpura Cyber P.S. Case No. 25 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2008. The police raid recovered mobiles from co‑accused but none from the petitioner, who claims …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 889.2 litres of liquor were recovered from his truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that …

Jitendra Bhagat @ Jitu @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered 99 live 8 mm cartridges and mobile phones from a vehicle he was driving. He claims innocence, arguing that the evidence against him rests …

Gauri Shankar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Gauri Shankar Mandal and Pappu Mandal, sought bail in a case (Chausa P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025) alleging conspiracy and firing under Section 109(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown co‑accused fired on the informant’s husband, but the …

Ajay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar Singh was arrested in a case alleging assault, attempted strangulation, attempted burning, and dowry-related offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged 25 days after …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family. He claimed innocence, alleging a counter‑case and a pending civil dispute between the parties, and pointed out that the injury to the alleged victim …

Chhotan Kumar @ Chhotan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five members of a Yadav family, were implicated in a mob assault on an informant and his family over a land dispute, resulting in serious injuries. They applied for bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 461 of 2025) that charged them under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was arrested in connection with NDNDPS offences under Sections 8(c) and 21(c) after 258.75 g of heroin was recovered from a co‑accused. The petitioner claimed he was merely a pillion rider unaware of the contraband and that the co‑accused’s confessional statement held no …

Parsunna Kumar @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three accused in a case registered under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the BNS for alleged involvement in a fatal assault, applied for bail. The prosecution alleged that the accused were caught at the scene of a robbery that led to a death, while the defence argued that the petitioners …

Kanchan Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a water tank. He asserted that he has a clean …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault case (PS‑Case No. 241 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted the …

Shailesh Yadav @ Shailesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 alleging that 282.06 litres of liquor were recovered from his cattle house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dharmendra Rai was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of a country‑made loaded pistol from his possession, charged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, contending …

Karu Yadav @ Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Karu Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act, where a loaded country‑made pistol and four live cartridges were allegedly recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that no incriminating article was actually found on him …

Guria Devi @ Gudia KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guria Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a house. He argued that he was not in actual …

Abdhesh Sahani @ Abadh Kishore Sahni @ AbdheshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, two brothers, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 concerning alleged possession of liquor and Jawa Mahua. They filed an anticipatory bail application. During pendency, petitioner 1 was arrested and his counsel sought to withdraw …

Amar Paswan @ Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amar Paswan and his son Pintu Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case alleging murder and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased, Deepak Kumar, was assaulted and his body burnt, while the defence argued that the …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a motorcycle, the charge arising solely from a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, was not arrested on the spot, and no stolen property was recovered from his possession. The State opposed …

Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shankar Yadav and Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Atri P.S. Case No. 510 of 2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the …

Raja Thathera @ Raja Tathera @ AkashdipversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raja Thathera and Piush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 348 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along …

Sekh Dawood @ Sheikh Daud @ SK DaudversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sekh Dawood, was arrested in connection with a case registered on 9 August 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 22 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, after 2 kg of ganja was recovered from the house of co‑accused Yogendra Dubey. The …

Hemlata Kumari @ Hemlata Devi @ Kumari HemlataversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hemlata Kumari, a woman resident of Muzaffarpur, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Sessions Trial No.595 of 2025) arising from PS Sadar Case No.833 of 2024, filed under sections 103(1), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that she ordered co‑accused …

Sandil Kumar @ Shandilya RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sandil Kumar and Navin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that no liquor was found in their conscious …

Nagina SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagina Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from the Dharauti river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Pramod MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pramod Mandal and Baijnath Mandal, applied for regular bail in a case registered under several provisions of the Arms Act, alleging that arms and ammunition were seized from a thatched hut belonging to a third person, Ajay Mandal, with whom they have no connection. The prosecution …

Vikky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikky Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 317(4) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after a police raid on a repair shop recovered two motorcycles. The co‑accused identified Kumar as one of the persons who had brought the motorcycles, but no vehicle was …

Reena Devi @ Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reena Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 22,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, charged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that no …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a …

Manish Kumar @ BaijaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a raid on a litchi orchard where police recovered firearms, ammunition and stolen bikes, and alleged that he was part of a group planning a crime. He is charged under IPC sections 399, 402, 413, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35. The petitioner …

Narendra Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Narendra Kumar Sah, applied for regular bail in a case under the NDPS Act where 57.88 kg of narcotics were seized from a vehicle allegedly driven by him. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, which the petitioner’s counsel argued has no …

Jhulan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jhulan Sah and Babita Devi, applied for regular bail in a criminal case (Madhaura PS Case No. 709 of 2025) filed under sections 109, 103, 303(2) and 76 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that, over a trivial dispute, co‑accused Laxman Sah and Pankaj Sah assaulted …

Ramanand Chaudhary @ Chunni ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramanand Chaudhary applied for regular bail in a murder case (Case No. 347 of 2025) where he is alleged to be the order‑giver, while co‑accused Ranjit Kumar Choudhary and Manjit Kumar allegedly fired the fatal shots. The petitioner claimed false implication, no prior criminal record, and had been in …

Navin Kumar @ BhonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Navin Kumar, applied for regular bail in a cyber‑related case (Cyber P.S. No.165 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that during a raid on 21‑Oct‑2025, the petitioner’s …

Rajesh Chaudhari @ Ranjesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Chaudhari, was arrested in connection with a homicide arising from a land‑dispute, alleged under IPC sections 302, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34. The informant claimed that Chaudhari and his son struck the informant’s father with a bamboo stick, leading to the father’s death. …

Vicky PanditversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vicky Pandit, was arrested in connection with a narcotics case (Haraiya P.S. Case No. 26 of 2024) for alleged possession of 134 grams of brown sugar, contravening several sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He contended that the seized quantity was …

Anjani Sah @ Anjani Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anjani Sah was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act after police recovered 6.8 kg of ganja from co‑accused Lalan Prasad Yadav. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that no narcotic substance was found on …

Sobeela Khatoon @ Subaila KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, residents of Bajitpur village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ujiyarpur PS Case No.283 of 2023) involving multiple IPC offences including assault, attempt to murder and robbery. They asserted that they are innocent, have clean antecedents and that no …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Deepak Kumar was arrested in connection with a FIR (Case No. 239 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault, robbery and rioting. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused persons, armed with iron rods, attacked the informant’s family and …

Shankar Singh @ Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shankar Singh, sought bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act where police recovered a pistol, magazine and live cartridges from a co‑accused’s house. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confessional statement of the co‑accused Mannu Kumar, with no …

PHULJHADI DEVI @ PHULJHARI DEVI @ FULJHARI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a mother and daughter, applied for regular bail in a case arising from a land dispute where the informant alleged that the co‑accused Kameshwar Ram assaulted his maternal aunt with a sickle, resulting in death. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated and had no prior …

Vidyanand MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vidyanand Mishra was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on his brother, the informant, using an iron rod and iron mushal, resulting in head injuries. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting the incident was a mutual fight stemming from a family dispute over a …

RAUSHAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Chakia P.S. Case No. 424 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused assaulted the son and daughter of an informant with an iron rod, intending to kill them, under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The …

Khaltha Kumar @ Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ KhaltaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khaltha Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.25 litres of liquor from the house of Viru Kumar. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no relationship with the alleged location, and the FIR omitted the …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ AkhileshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 652.875 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized …

Geeta KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Geeta Kumari, the sister‑in‑law of a woman who was allegedly murdered in a dowry dispute, was named as an accused in FIR No. 84 of 2025 under Sections 85, 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was lodged 17 years after the alleged crime and the informant later …

KARAN MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a bush near a river and from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 24.75 litres of liquor and beer from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Hira Lal Singh @ Heera Lal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hira Lal Singh, an ex‑army man now serving in the State Auxiliary Police, was arrested for allegedly driving a police vehicle while intoxicated and colliding with a three‑wheeler carrying the handicapped son of an informant, resulting in the son’s death. He was charged under Sections 281, 125(a), …

Dhiraj Mishra @ Dhiraj Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Mishra, was implicated in an assault case where he allegedly attacked an informant with an iron rod and a pistol butt, causing injuries, following a land dispute. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and highlighting a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and that …

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, was implicated in a case involving assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and conspiracy under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that no specific allegation linked him to the assault on the informant's …

Munshi RishiyashanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munshi Rishiyashan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with PS Salimpur case no.236 of 2024 under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleged to have been robbed by four accused who also obtained a confessional statement from him before police. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that …

Chandan Ray @ Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in …

Yashodhar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yashodhar Yadav, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case where 450 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for …

Vishwajeet Bantar @Vishojeet BantarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwajeet and Abhishek Bantar were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering 49.2 litres of liquor from a public canal. The petitioners, claiming a clean antecedent and no …

Shiv Kumar Yadav @ Shivrath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 225 litres of liquor recovered from a bush near a canal. The petitioner …

Ranvir Kumar @ Suman Kumar @ MPversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranvir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Shahpur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025) involving alleged theft of Rs. 19 lakh and assault on a driver. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, Sampurn Kumar, as the …

Md. Intakhab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Intakhab Alam, was arrested in Purnea for allegedly possessing 4.2 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup, alleged to violate Sections 8(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 27(i)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. He contended that the seizure was illegal, citing …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with an anti‑public‑servant case (No. 88 of 2025) alleging assault and grievous injuries to an informant's family. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR did not specifically implicate him and that the injury report showed only one head injury, …

Kanhaiya Chaudhary @ KanhaiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9 litres of liquor, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged recovery occurred on land not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was filed by an …

Hareram MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hareram Mandal and Bijay Mandal were arrested in connection with a case (PS Kahalgaon case No. 387 of 2021) alleging assault with a knife, extortion of Rs.2,00,000 and threats to kill, punishable under several IPC sections. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated because of an …

Md. JahangirversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Jahangir, was acquitted by the trial court in a criminal case. Following the acquittal, the petitioner filed an application before the High Court, the nature of which is not specified in the record. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently moved that, since the acquittal rendered …

Jahur Miya @ Jahur BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jahur Miya was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of 20 bottles of codeine‑based cough syrup from the motorcycle of co‑accused Uttam Giri. The petitioner contended that the seized syrup was not in his conscious possession and that his name appeared only in the co‑accused's …

BHAGWATI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Bhagwati Devi, the wife of Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She was not present at the spot of seizure and did not have the liquor in her conscious …

Mandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mandeep Kumar was arrested in Gaya on a complaint that 31.6 kg of poppy husk had been recovered from his possession, leading to charges under Sections 8, 18(c) and 20(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized quantity was below the statutory …

Meghu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Meghu Paswan, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 8.94 litres of liquor from his house, a joint family property, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in his …

Raju Rai @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 280 litres of spirit were recovered from a bush near his house but not from his possession. He argued that the …

Yasoverdhan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Yashovardhan Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to a disputed land transaction. The prosecution’s case described a complex scheme involving Baibhav Kumar, Manoj Yadav and others, but did not …

Umawati Devi @ Umrawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umawati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in her possession and was seized from premises adjacent to her house. She has a prior case under the Excise Act and contended that …

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 800 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. During a vehicle check, a pistol was recovered from a co‑accused and a mobile phone from the petitioner; no …

Mohammad SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohammad Saddam, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of spirit from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, the seized vehicle is …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kundan Kumar and Mandan Kumar, were arrested in connection with a theft of Rs.5,00,180 and two mobile phones under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. The FIR does not name them; their alleged involvement stems solely from a co-accused's confessional statement, and no stolen items were …

Mukesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Mukesh Rai and Ajay Kumar were arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, with a live cartridge recovered from each of them and a country‑made pistol recovered from a co‑accused. They filed an application for regular bail, …

Md. Tanveer @ Tanveer @ Md. TanwirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Tanveer, was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol was allegedly recovered from his possession during an attempted escape. He contended that no incriminating article was actually found on him and that he had been …

Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his shop and that he was not in possession of the contraband. He argued that the …

Suman Kumar Sahu @ Suman Narayan SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Suman Kumar Sahu and Arun Kumar Sahu, were charged under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting an informant and his son near a school and stealing gold ornaments. They sought regular bail, arguing that there is a case‑and‑counter‑case, that they have clean antecedents, and …

Munna MusharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Mushar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the FIR was general and omnibus and that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part …

Bangar Rai @ Rajeshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Brahmchari Pokhar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a canal. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered …

Akash ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akash Choudhary was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and a co‑accused assaulted an informant and stole Rs 5,000. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused Rahul Kumar struck the informant with a brick, while the petitioner denied any involvement in the assault and claimed he was …

Satrajeet Chaudhary @ Sarvajeet Chaudhary @ SatarjeetversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satrajeet Chaudhary, applied for bail in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where he was implicated solely on the basis of a co-accused's confessional statement. No incriminating material was recovered from him, and he had been in custody since September 2025 with a charge‑sheet …

Akshay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akshay Kumar Yadav applied for bail in a case (PS No. 255 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 309(6) and 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved masked gunmen firing inside Shiv Jewellers, resulting in the death of the informant’s …

VIKRAM KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he enticed and kidnapped a girl with intent to marry her, under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the alleged victim is a 21‑year‑old adult who voluntarily went …

Upendra Kumar @ Chhotu @ Upendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 9.75 litres of liquor from the dhaba owned by petitioner No.2. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were …

SHIVDANI CHOUDHARY @ SHIVDANI CHAUDHARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivdani Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, where 2.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him and that he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that the FIR did not …

Santu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of jawa mahua from a public area. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft of an informant's car, alleged under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution's case relied on a co‑accused's confessional statement and suspicion, with no material recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner claimed …

Dashrath BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dashrath Bhuiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor …

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three individuals with prior excise cases, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 336.960 litres of liquor. They argued they …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with Alamganj Police Station Case No.777 of 2025, alleged to have committed an offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a scooty was stolen from a court campus, but the petitioner was not named in …

Guli Sah @ Goli Sah @ Gulli SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guli Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor near Sirani Canal. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a structure adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that she has a …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was charged under Sections 305 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged theft from an informant's mill, with the FIR lodged three days after the incident. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and three co‑accused stole articles and Rs.5,000 in …

Sri KumariversusThe State of Bihar through Vigilance Bureau, Head Office, Patna

DISPOSED

Sri Kumari, a school teacher, was taken into cognizance by the Chief Judicial Magistrate for alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). She filed an application invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the magistrate's order dated 27-02-2024. The petitioner’s …

Md. Shekh RahamtullahversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

Petitioner Md. Shekh Rahamtullah filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18-12-2014/09-01-2015 issued by the Circle Officer, Madhepur, which granted a parcha in favor of respondents Kanni and Md. Hussain over land claimed by the petitioner (Khata No. 23, Khesra No. 2148). …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the …

MANTU SINGH @ MINTU KUMAR @ MANTU THAKURversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantu Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw his petition after the trial in PS case No.445/2015 had already commenced. The trial court had examined two charge-sheet witnesses and five remained unexamined, and charges had been framed …

Ranvir SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranvir Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32, 41, 56(b) and 62 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 438.75 litres of liquor from a godown. He contended that he has a …

Rama Nand ChoudharyversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rama Nand Choudhary, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside two orders: a revision order dated 15‑12‑2016 concerning land‑ceiling pre‑emption, and a pre‑emption appeal order dated 10‑4‑2005. He argued that a subsequent change in law relating to pre‑emption …

Laliteshwar Nath TiwariversusState Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laliteshwar Nath Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Bihar, the Collector, and the Executive Officer of Nagar Parishad not disturb his possession of a parcel of land, asserting rent receipts since 1961. The Nagar Parishad contended that it possessed …

Md. Reyaz Ansari @ PappuversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Reyaz Ansari, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a Bihar Land Tribunal order that dismissed his earlier challenge to a ceiling revision order, and also sought a mandamus directing the transfer of land by registered deed as per earlier orders. The petitioner …

Ramesh Paswan and OrsversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

CONSIGNED

The petitioners, sons of the late Narayan Paswan, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Bihar Land Tribunal order dated 28‑03‑2018 that had annulled a Collector’s order granting them land under a Basgit Parcha. They also requested a direction restraining the respondents from disturbing their …

Chhavi Narayan Singh and OrsversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioners challenged an order dated 9 July 2018 passed by the Chairman of the Bihar Land Tribunal (BLT) under Section 14 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, which declared a 2003 order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate as void and directed that the pre‑2003 Jamabandi be maintained. The petitioners …

Lal Bahadur SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging a July 9, 2018 order of the Bihar Land Tribunal (BLT) that, invoking Section 14 of the BLT Act, declared an earlier order of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate dated April 25, 2003 as void and directed that the pre‑existing jamabandi be restored. They …

Satyanarayan KamativersusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Satyanarayan Kamati, filed a writ petition seeking payment of wages for the period September 2001 to July 2007, alleging he worked as a machine operator in the university's residential office and P.G. Men's Hostel. He relied on a letter from the Vice‑Chancellor dated 02‑06‑2005 and a …

Shiv Shankar Singh and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of landowners from Barjhalla village, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside two earlier orders – one dated 14 July 2017 in B.L.T. Case No. 912/2016 and another dated 13 February 2012 issued by the Minister of Land Reforms under Section 45‑B of the …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Kumar filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging the actions of various state officials. The petitioner sought the Court's permission to approach the Labour Court for redress of his grievance. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court considered whether such …

Ramjee Yadav,versusThe State of Bihar,

ALLOWED

The petitioners, former employees of the dissolved SCADA now merged with the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI), sought parity in the grant of 7th Pay Commission benefits, claiming they were unfairly given the benefits only from 01‑Oct‑2021 while other WALMI employees received them from …

Prof. Sheikh Mujtaba HussainversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Prof. Sheikh Mujtaba Hussain, a retired university professor, challenged a 2019 order by Patna University that forfeited his past service and terminated him on grounds of misconduct, despite no show‑cause notice, departmental inquiry or any statutory procedure under the University Statutes. He had …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rohit Kumar, a government teacher, challenged the cancellation of his posting to a GPS school made by the Education Department. He argued that the cancellation, effected through Letter No.72 dated 18‑01‑2021, was done without giving him a hearing and violated the Right to Education Act, 2009 and its …

Jay Nandan PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Petitioner Jay Nandan Prasad filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of various state officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore. The Court noted that the petitioner …

Hotri Devi Alias Hotri KumariversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

Petitioner Hotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking an order restraining private respondents (Nos. 6‑12) from receiving any compensation for land she purchased, and directing the Deputy General Manager (No. 5) not to pay any compensation for the construction of State Highway No. 81. The State of …

Ram Swarup MandalversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

WITHDRAWN

Ram Swarup Mandal filed a writ petition seeking to quash orders of the Bihar Land Tribunal and the Commissioner and to confirm an earlier order granting him possession of land, alleging he is the son of the late Gujai Mandal and a peaceful possessor. Respondents, including the State of Bihar and …

VIKASH KUMAR VERMA @ VIKASH KUMARversusState Of Bihar and Anr

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Verma, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. He later sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the court considered whether such …

M/s. Sainik Food Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioners, operators of sand mines, challenged the demand for outstanding installment payments, arguing that the Environment Clearance prohibited mining during the rainy season. The Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 12036 of 2016, dismissed their intervention applications but directed that …

Hari PanditversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

Hari Pandit filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 19 July 2017, which dismissed his application for restoration of ceiling case No. 06/2007 to its original file. The petitioner requested that the ceiling case be restored in the interest of …

SUDARSHAN TIWARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioners Sudarshan Tiwari, Jharkande Tiwari and Umesh Tiwari filed a criminal writ petition (WJC No.504 of 2019) in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the hearing on 13-01-2026, although the State's …

Anup Sagar SinghversusThe Union Of India and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anup Sagar Singh, challenged a notice fixing compensation of Rs 1,673,130.50 for his 25.5‑decimal land acquired for the widening of NH‑84, alleging that the land was classified as agricultural despite being of commercial character and having a higher market value. He sought a writ of …

Ishrat BanoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, a group of relatives of the late Md. Salahuddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Nazia Tarannum. The petitioners later informed the Court that the dispute had been settled between the parties. They sought the …

Kiran KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Constable Kiran Kumari, filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Subhash Chandra Gurjar, alleging sexual exploitation and blackmail under the FIR. She contended that the lower court failed to consider Section 90 of the IPC, which invalidates …

Ram Vivek Singh and AnrversusThe Union Of India and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Vivek Singh and Ajay Kumar Singh, sought compensation for land acquired for the Indo‑Nepal Border road in Madhubani district. They alleged that the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA) dismissed their application filed under Section 64 of the Right …

Aashish Kumar JhaversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aashish Kumar Jha, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a departmental order that rejected his claim for regularisation as Gramin Dak Sewak and requesting his regularisation with all benefits. The Union of India objected, contending that the grievance must be pursued before the …

Manoj Kumar Sudhanshu, Dy. S.P., Batch- 45thversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioner, a Deputy Superintendent of Police, was disciplined for allegedly mishandling a supplementary investigation and issuing a No‑Objection Certificate that led to the de‑freezing of Rs 50 lakhs belonging to accused persons. He was charged, suspended and, after an inquiry, punished with …

Ramchandra Chaudhary @ Ramchandra PasiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ramchandra Chaudhary appealed against the rejection of his anticipatory bail application in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, where he was alleged to have participated in an assault that led to the death of the informant's father. The appellant …

PRADEEP KUMAR TIWARI @ PRADEEP KR. TIWARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a complaint in Buxar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 09.12.2024 and 09.01.2026, nor did the petitioner respond to repeated calls. The court observed …

Raj Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raj Kumar Sinha, a contract Tax Collector in Motihari Nagar Parishad, was removed from service by a letter dated 05.01.2022 without any departmental inquiry or hearing, prompting him to file a writ petition seeking quashing of the removal order and reinstatement. The petitioner argued that his …

Anandi Tanti @ Anandi Das,versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a former Vritya (Anusevak) of the Zila Parishad, retired in 2008 and subsequently received the Additional Cost of Pension (ACP) benefit under earlier regularisation rules. An earlier High Court order (19 July 2017 in CWJC No. 6865 of 2012) had directed that the ACP benefit be paid, …

Kamla Devi @ Kamla Sharma and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISMISSED

The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 27 July 2010 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code against them. The petition was filed in 2016, more than six years after the impugned order, …

Ram Naresh PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of descendants claiming raiyati rights over a one‑acre‑plus plot in Barun, Aurangabad, challenged a series of orders that rejected their claim for compensation and initiated title verification proceedings. They alleged that the Deputy Collector, the LRDC and Sub‑Divisional …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Surendra Yadav, Sobha Devi and Navin Kumar were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and his family in a land‑dispute context, with injuries including a fractured hand, alleged under multiple IPC sections. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR’s allegations …

Ketan KumarversusState Of Bihar and Anr

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ketan Kumar, filed a complaint alleging that the opposite party had issued a cheque for Rs.1,88,227 that later bounced, invoking Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as well as Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The magistrate dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was …

Dhananjay Yadav @ Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged cruelty and dowry demand under Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC in Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 311 of 2015. The parties subsequently entered into a mediation settlement dated 08.01.2026, which was approved by both counsel. The petitioner …

Prabhakar Swami and AnrversusState Of Bihar and Anr

ALLOWED

Petitioners Prabhakar Swami and Babbli Swami filed an application to set aside the order of cognizance dated 9 June 2016 in Complaint Case No. 488C of 2015, which alleged that they, along with other accused, tortured and ousted the complainant from her matrimonial home over a dowry dispute. They …

MD. ATHAR PARWEZversusTHE STATE OF BIHARTHROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Md. Athar Parwez filed a writ petition seeking to quash Police Station Kanti Case No. 102 of 2021, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406 and 420 and NI Act section 139. The High Court observed that a charge‑sheet had already been filed and cognizance taken, and the case was at the …

BABY NAZversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, relatives of the husband of the complainant, sought quashing of a criminal proceeding initiated under Section 498A IPC for alleged dowry demand and cruelty. The complainant had filed a compromise petition on 31‑07‑2019, indicating that the dispute was settled and she no longer …

Ram Gopal DroliaversusState Of Bihar and Anr

ALLOWED

Ram Gopal Drolia filed an application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated notices, even when the matter was scheduled for a second hearing at 4:00 PM. The State of Bihar and the second opposite party were represented by counsel. The court noted the …

NARESH TANTI @ NARESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Tanti filed a criminal writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash a letter dated 31‑03‑2022 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate ordering him to vacate disputed land and to restrain the State from executing the vacate order until the petition was decided. He claimed that, …

Arbind PathakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Arbind Pathak and Durgawati Devi, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, applied for bail in connection with Complaint No. 1186 of 2024 alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 406 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and …

Rajesh Kumar Sikaria @ Rajesh SikariaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Sikaria sought to quash a cognizance order dated 06‑05‑2014 in which a Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of offences under Section 188 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 313, 323 and 324 of the Bihar Municipal Corporation Act against eleven …

Anil Yadav and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISMISSED

The petitioners, members of the Yadav family, filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2004 complaint. They contended that for the past ten years no witnesses have appeared after the examination of only two witnesses, resulting in a …

Ramu SawversusState Of Bihar and Anr

WITHDRAWN

Ramu Saw filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court seeking interim protection. The petitioner later requested to withdraw that application and to raise all substantive grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The court, after hearing counsel, permitted …

Rajeev Kumar Ojha @ Raju OjhaversusState Of Bihar and Anr

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Ojha, sought to withdraw his application and reserve the right to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The court allowed the withdrawal, directing that any future application be heard by the lower court in line with the Supreme Court's decision in Kanchan …