Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 33801–34000

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Yadav and Madhusudan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act. They contended that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Krishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 916.200 litres of liquor from nine motorcycles. He asserted a clean antecedent, claimed he was not in possession of the …

Md. Rakim @ Md. Rakim AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Rakim Ali, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly possessing 4.52 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The State …

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Gautam Kumar and Anil Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended), where 108.75 litres of liquor was recovered from a joint family house and 1.8 litres from a bush. They argued that the …

Md. AnwarulversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Anwarul and Md. Irfan, were arrested in connection with a violent dispute over grazing rights, facing multiple serious charges under the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, 2023. They claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations against them were non‑specific and that no injury was …

Basant Yadav @ Vasant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Basant Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 116.935 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …

Amit Kumar @ ChintuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from a house that forms part of a joint family property adjacent to a petrol pump. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Anil Choudhary @ Anil ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 14 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found …

Vikky Yadav @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Vikky YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikky Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 870.120 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not arrested at …

Chhotan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotan Tiwari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 34.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from an under‑constructed house and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, …

Mukesh Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 32,400 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, where 23.5 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …

Bindeshwar Yadav @ Karamchari YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bindeshwar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2010 case alleging his participation in an extremist attack on a construction company’s camp, involving extortion, arson and use of explosives. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with …

Surendar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendar Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 11.88 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, attracting charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual …

Md Intiyaz AnshariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Intiyaz Anshari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 425 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was …

Md Amanullah @ AmanullahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Amanullah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 61.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Soni Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an excise investigation. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, requesting liberty to re‑file it …

Sheo Muni ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sheo Muni Choudhary, filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an auction notice dated 08‑08‑2019 issued by the District Fishery Officer concerning certain ponds (Jalkar) in Kaimur district. The State counsel submitted Annexure‑1 showing that the statutory settlement period for the …

Bharat Singh,versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bharat Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 May 2019 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, concerning pre-emption (Revision No. 179/2018) and seeking its quash. He also requested that the Divisional Commissioner dispose of Revision No. 179/2008 on merit and that …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court entertained two anticipatory bail applications filed by Krishna Kant Kumar (also identified as Manoj Kumar) in separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a police case involving the alleged recovery of 555.57 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and a Basa. The …

Nandlal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nandlal Singh and Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 866.52 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house and an auto. They argued that no liquor was found in their …

Pappu Yadav @ Ravindra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public bush near Chalho Hill. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the location did not …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the …

Hesamuddin KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Hesamuddin Khan and Raju Kumar, were arrested as driver and co‑driver of a truck from which 600 litres of cough syrup were seized, and were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they had no conscious possession of the contraband, …

Santoke Bhuiya @ Santokhi BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santoke Bhuiya sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of the …

Rajdev GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajdev Giri filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its officials to acquire his land (Khata No. 185, Khesra No. 3384) on which a bridge‑cum‑road under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana was being constructed, to stop the construction, and to pay …

Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Rai, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean antecedent, argued that the liquor was …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend had misused his …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 10 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, making …

Kishori Kewat @ Kishori PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 15.8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public place near a brick kiln. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery site did not belong …

Nitish Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that he owned. He claimed the motorcycle had been stolen, a fact he reported to police on 23-02-2024, and argued that no liquor was …

Md. Minhaj AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Minhaj Alam, owner of a scooty from which 4.68 litres of liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that he was not in possession at …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented jaggery from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the FIR lacked a proper informant, that the alleged …

Chhote PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhote Paswan sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his joint family house and from another house. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Rana Pratap KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rana Pratap Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 10 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Pappu Kumar Gupta @ Pappu Kumar Shah @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.6 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being …

Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 157.2 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor was …

Dinanath SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Dinanath Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Subodh Rai @ Mukesh Rai @ Subod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Subodh Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 60.300 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was …

Umesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case (PS No. 477 of 2025) for alleged possession of 50 litres of liquor and 400 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, alleged under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vikram Kumar and Rajdeo Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 170 litres of liquor. Rajdeo Chaudhary was arrested while the application was pending, and …

Bindeshwari ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bindeshwari Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the liquor was not in his conscious control, …

Ishwardhari DinkarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ishwardhari Dinkar and Bhim Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Sone river bank. They argued they have clean antecedents, no liquor was found in their …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Suraj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara. The court observed that there was no prosecution instituted against the petitioner. …

Rahul Kumar @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Pushpendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pushpendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no clean possession of the …

Manjit Chaurasiya @ Manjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjit Chaurasiya sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 55.720 litres of liquor from Ganauri Mandal, with which he claimed no connection. The petitioner argued that no liquor was …

BEENA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Beena Devi, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail that had been granted in a criminal case. The State of Bihar and the respondent, Santosh Paswan, opposed the application. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the application for cancellation …

Prayag Bhuiyan @ Prayag RikiyasanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Prayag Bhuiyan filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code involving the theft of a steel‑laden trailer worth Rs.22,00,314. He contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and that the only link to him is a confessional statement of a …

Tapan Yadav @ Tapan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tapan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a public hut near a temple. He has two prior criminal cases, one also under the Excise Act, but the alleged liquor was …

Abhinav Kumar @ Sunny SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhinav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 455 litres of spirit from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 75 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend misused the vehicle. He argued he had a clean criminal record and that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from a scooty. He has three prior criminal cases and contends that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Rakesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 30.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a third‑party, Madan, and not from his own possession. He contended that the case against …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Laddu Kumar @ Laddu ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laddu Kumar (Thakur) was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage, charged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the girl was abducted, while the petitioner argued that the girl …

Pradyut SamantaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradyut Samanta, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 2,646.72 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the …

Pappu Singh @ Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pappu Singh, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which armed assailants entered the informant's house and opened fire, injuring Bhola Singh gravely and assaulting Lallu Yadav. He applied for bail, arguing that the prosecution's case was vague and did not …

Amarjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 102 litres of liquor from a public area near an Ahar. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

SureshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh, the owner of a vehicle from which 300.750 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, and …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean …

Aditya RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aditya Raj, filed a second application for anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.72079 of 2025, relating to an excise case pending before the Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-1, Banka. He had previously sought anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.44530 of 2021, …

Nawal RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nawal Roy, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 102 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, the seized vehicle was not his, and the complaint originated from a chowkidar, raising doubts about …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 29 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was …

DINANATH RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinanath Ram, feared arrest in a case alleging that 25.20 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no clean antecedent, was not arrested …

SANJAY PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 666 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Amarnath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarnath Pandey sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84.48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was only the owner of …

Santosh Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.250 litres of liquor recovered from Baleshwar Kumar. The petitioner, who has thirteen prior cases, argued that he was not caught in …

Biru Mishra @ Birendra Mishra @ Birendra Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biru Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to the alleged recovery of 25,500 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not …

Madhurendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a B.Sc. Nursing student, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.135/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the POCSO Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The allegations stem from a neighbour dispute where the …

Md. Rashid @ DavidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Rashid @ David, was arrested in connection with a violent encounter in which miscreants fired on police and attempted to flee to Nepal. He is charged under IPC sections 353, 307, 332, 333, 412, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27, 35, with the prosecution alleging …

Abdul WadudversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Abdul Wadud was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the motorcycle had been stolen before the incident, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Dharmshila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmshila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She …

Nandev Yadav @ Nand Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and relatives, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Gajendra Nath Ojha, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by Mr. Choubey Jawahar, opposed the …

Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 970.200 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.75 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Lalan Yadav @ Prem Raj @ Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(4) and 111(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor from ten motorcycles. He argued …

Shrawan YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shrawan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 9.160 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious …

MohitversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 3067.56 litres of liquor from a truck and three vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Anand Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal of the …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard belonging to another person. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, …

Sujit Kumar @ FaramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor not from his possession. He has six prior criminal cases, four under the Excise Act, and contended that the …

Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 432 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving alleged recovery of 2,682.9 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Satyendra Rai @ Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 180.18 litres of liquor were recovered from a bathan (open space) linked to him and another person. He argued that no liquor was found in …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Sumangal Kumar Rai @ Sumangal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Navin PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Navin Paswan, a life‑term convict, applied for bail in a case (PS Case No. 160 of 2025) alleging offences of extortion, robbery, attempted murder and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Paswan, along with co‑accused, demanded money, seized a gold …

Binod DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Binod Das and Ranjit Das, were arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with a sword, farsa and axe and extortion of Rs.10 lakh, charged under Sections 341, 324, 326, 307 and 506/34 of the IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the extortion …

Shyamdev Chaudhari @ Shyamdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyamdev Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Chunchun Kumar Sah @ Chunchun SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in offences under the NDPS Act, Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, and the Arms Act. The allegations stemmed from a co-accused's confessional statement linking the petitioner to the supply of a gun used in …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vicky Kumar and Vivek Kumar were arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant and his wife under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with co‑accused, attacked the informant’s wife with sticks, fists and slaps, causing injuries, while …

Rajan SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rajan Sahni, filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 7 January 2026, his counsel, Mr. Raju Kumar, requested to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …

Manoj Chaudhary @ Manoj SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on the informant's sister and family members, invoking several serious IPC sections. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR contained vague and omnibus allegations, was filed after a two‑day delay, and that there was no specific …

Umesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners Umesh Ram, Achhelal Ram, Bankelal and Laddu Ram were acquitted by the trial court in a criminal case arising from Mirganj, Gopalganj. They subsequently filed a petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the …

Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prince Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and robbery of an informant who allegedly opposed a snatching of cash and a gold ring. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a land dispute and that the informant filed the case to prevent him from …

Raja Kumar Mandal @ Pravesh Mandal @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar Mandal, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute case (Bhargama P.S. Case No. 104 of 2025) alleging assault, grievous hurt and other offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant with an …

Shiv Mangal Singh @ Shiv Mangal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five residents of Tulsi Tola, Rohtas, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with PS‑Kachhwan Case No. 64 of 2025, which alleged assault with weapons and theft against the informant’s family under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They argued that the FIR named …

Suchun DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Suchun Devi, Sanjay Sah, Ranjay Sah and Angad Sah—were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 103 and 109 r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting the father‑in‑law of an informant, who later died. The prosecution alleged that the accused …

Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ganesh Kumar, a student with no criminal record, was implicated in a case where a group of students allegedly demanded Rs.5,000 from a clinic staff and assaulted them when refused. He was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 308(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik …

Raviranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners were accused of forcibly occupying land and cutting sugarcane, leading to an assault on an informant, under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the case stemmed from a land dispute. The …

Sajan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Sajan Kumar Yadav and Shambhu Yadav, were involved in a family quarrel that escalated into physical assaults, leading to charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). Petition 1 withdrew his anticipatory bail application, while Petition 2 sought …

Nilesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition against the State of Bihar and the Circle Officer, Sultanganj. The petitioner claimed that the order of the writ court had been complied with, rendering the petition infructuous. He prayed for a disposal order on that basis. The learned …

Dr. Sachindra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Four doctors filed a petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioners argued that the order of the writ court had been complied with, rendering the petition no longer maintainable. They sought a formal order declaring the case …

Sugita Rani,versusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sugita Rani, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and its officials. During the hearing on 7 January 2026, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the petitioner had instructed him to withdraw the writ …

Vipin SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Vipin Sah and Priti Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related murder case (Singhwara P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025) under Sections 80, 303(2) and 61(2) of the BNS. The prosecution alleges that they, along with co‑accused, tortured and strangulated the …

Sushant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushant Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in the recovery of 240.3 litres of liquor from behind a temple. He claimed he was falsely implicated, had no possession of the liquor, and was not …

Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three residents of Dhureparsa, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with Gehlaur Police Station Case No. 46 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The informant claimed that the …

Dr. Bilquish BariversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Dr. Bilquish Bari filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Animal Husbandry Department. The petitioner, through counsel Ms. Anjum Perveen, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the writ application. The court examined …

Aarti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The three sisters, Aarti, Divya and Seema Kumari, petitioned for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Amas P.S. Case No. 262 of 2025) that alleged their father/relative Mahmud Chaudhary fled police and assaulted officers, resulting in minor injuries to constables Pinky Kumari and Priyanka …

Sudhanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, seven residents of Shankarpur Road, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with PS Dighwara case No. 255 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. They were accused of forcibly …

Dipendra Nayak @ Dipu Nayak @ Dipendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dipendra Nayak and Gopal Nayak, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly assaulting an informant and attempting to outrage his modesty. They contended that the present case was a …

Rahul TurhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rahul Turha was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing serious injury. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the injury to the informant was simple, that his side had previously filed a …

Tabarak KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tabarak Khan and Taslim Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that on 29 July 2025 the accused, armed with lathis and rods, assaulted an informant. The petitioners contended they were innocent, …

Mahavir SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, a group of individuals from Bachhauta village, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4662 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction by the Khagaria Sessions Court. During the hearing on 7 January 2026, the appellants informed the court that they had surrendered and …

Ramji YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ramji Yadav, the petitioner, feared his arrest in connection with FIR No. 288/2023 filed at Rafiganj Police Station, which alleged that he assaulted the husband of an informant with a garasa, causing grievous injuries as certified by a doctor. The FIR charges him under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 …

Kashi SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Kashi Sahani and Meghnath Sahani, were implicated in a FIR alleging robbery, looting, arson and assault under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contend that the allegations are false, arising from a land‑dispute motive, and point to a four‑day delay in filing …

Dhana Devi @ Dhna DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Dhana Devi and Mohan Chaudhary, were accused of assaulting an informant, who is also a family member, with an iron rod and lathi, causing injuries and alleged theft of valuables. They faced charges under Sections 126(2), 352, 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Bhola Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bhola Kumar Choudhary filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. …

Daulti Devi @ Daulati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Daulti Devi, Rahul Kumar, Lalti Devi, and Suraj Kumar—were implicated in an FIR alleging assault, theft of a gold chain, and other offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 74, 303(2) and 117(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They filed a bail petition fearing arrest, contending that …

Momina Khatoon @ Bibi Momina KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Momina Khatoon was named in an FIR (Lokaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025) for alleged participation in a protest following the murder of Md. Jahangir, during which a police vehicle was vandalised and police personnel injured. The petition sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR contains only a …

Sonalal Prasad @ Sonelal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five residents of Gora Semra village, applied for bail in connection with a police case (Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025) alleging assault with a lathi and iron rod, causing injuries, and a ransom demand. They argued that the injuries attributable to them were simple, that there …

Gagan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gagan Kumar, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar, several government officials and officers of Punjab National Bank. The petition sought relief (specific relief not detailed) but during proceedings the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court …

Dharamshila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Dharamshila Devi sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging she assaulted an informant with bricks causing a head injury. The petitioner contended that the allegations …

Achhelal BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Bada Pakahi, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Case No. 166 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The incident involved the petitioners …

Sher AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, eleven residents of Maraujhia village, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with a communal clash case (Nasriganj PS Case No. 117 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Nagar Suraksha Sanhita. The police report described a fight between members of two …

Angaj Kumar @ Aangaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Angaj Kumar, filed an application for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged rape. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed rape on the informant, whose statement was recorded under Section 183 of …

Jagdish JoshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Jagdish Joshi, owner of a truck, was implicated in a case where 2833.200 litres of illicit liquor were recovered hidden under the driver’s seat. He filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest under sections 30(a), 41(i) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Chanda Devi @ Ramdulari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three women residing in Katahan village, were implicated in a neighbor dispute that escalated into a physical altercation, resulting in injuries to the informant and his family. They were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was accused of an offence punishable under Section 64 of the B.N.S. for allegedly entering a woman's house, undressing her and having sexual intercourse on 19 July 2025. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the complaint was false and motivated by a dispute between …

Savitri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Savitri Devi, widow of the late Mandhata Prasad Singh who served as a Panchayat Sewak trainee from April to July 1999, alleged that she was never paid the salary due for the training period and subsequent posting, despite representations filed in 2018. She sought a writ of mandamus directing the …

Suganti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of a family involved in a land dispute, were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and others, causing injuries. They sought bail, asserting a clean antecedent and that the assault allegations were vague. The …

Sunil PanditversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunil Pandit and his wife Rambha Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, tortured the …

Mantun Kumar @ Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mantun Kumar and Anant Kumar were arrested in connection with a case alleging they assaulted an informant with a knife and pistol, violating sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution presented the informant’s injury report, while the defence argued the injury was …

Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he pressed the neck of an informant, invoking several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner asserted innocence, claiming no injury to the informant, no overt act, and a clean antecedent. The State opposed the …

Raj Kishor MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raj Kishor Mahto filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials concerning land reforms. The petitioner sought relief that, according to his counsel, should be pursued in a competent civil court rather than through a writ …

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Ray @ BiruversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was named in an FIR alleging that he, together with co‑accused, assaulted an informant with an iron pipe and looted construction materials from a site, with some of the stolen items recovered from his house. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest …

Devendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four residents of Sarsaula Khurd petitioned the Patna High Court seeking anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging they participated in an assault on an informant's group to dispossess them of land, citing offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners argued they were …

Munna Kumar @ Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Rupa Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged assault and theft on 28 July 2025. The prosecution alleged that Munna assaulted an informant with an axe causing grievous injury, while Rupa …

Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Barsam village, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged they assaulted an informant and others using weapons on 2 August 2024. They sought a correction in the father's name of petitioner No.2, which the court permitted. The prosecution charged them …

Kanhiya Yadav @ Kanhiya Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kanhiya Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging that he administered intoxicants in food, abducted a woman and her three children, and sexually abused the woman and misbehaved with her minor daughter. The charges were under IPC sections 363, 365, 34 and POCSO Act …

Awdhesh Rajbanshi @ Abhay RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Awdhesh Rajbanshi, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Kadirganj PS Case No. 231 of 2025) involving alleged assault and the alleged snatching of Rs. 1,62,000. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused surrounded an informant's vehicle, assaulted the informant and …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was accused of assaulting the informant's son with a wooden log, causing serious but described as simple injury, along with other alleged assaults and theft. He applied for bail, arguing that the parties were agnates and the fight was a trivial dispute, and presented an …

Shiva KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shiva Kumar, Rajan Kumar and Gautam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant. The FIR names six accused, including the petitioners, and 10‑15 unknown persons …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, was implicated in a robbery case where four unknown assailants allegedly looted Rs. 15,000 and a laptop from an informant. The petitioner’s name surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Manshu Kumar, who identified him as an associate. The petitioner, who has …

Mantu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging his involvement in a robbery and extortion of Rs. 20,000 transferred via PhonePe on 26 March 2025. The FIR implicated about 20 persons in intercepting a truck carrying animal bones, but did not …

Somu kumar @ Samant BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Somu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case (PS Alamnagar, Case No.236/2025) involving alleged offences under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where three unknown assailants …

Barun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Barun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, alleging kidnapping of a minor and creation of nude photographs that were circulated online. The petitioner …

Ramroop @ Rohan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ramroop @ Rohan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging destruction of a boundary wall, assault, and firing a rifle at an informant over a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attacked the informant and discharged a …

Md. Mushtakim @ Md. MustaquimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Mushtakim and his wife Hannaj Begam, feared arrest in a case (PS Case No.821/2025) where the FIR alleged that co‑accused Fayyaz Ahmad attempted to rape and assault an informant, and that the petitioners allegedly snatched jewellery and cash from the same informant. The …

Sandip RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Mansahata Hardiya, were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant and others cleaning a Chhath ghat, causing injuries. They claimed they were falsely implicated, alleging the informant had been pressuring them to …

Indrajeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Indrajeet Sahni was arrested in connection with the seizure of 2,623 litres of illicit liquor, alleged to be in violation of sections 30(a), 41(i) and 42(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and sought bail, offering to donate Rs.25,000 …

Vidyanand ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vidyanand Thakur petitioned for bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging that he and several unknown persons assaulted an informant and his family. The FIR, filed two days after the alleged incident, charges him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar and Akash Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case of assault alleged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the case was retaliatory, and that there was no specific allegation against them individually. …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Avinash Kumar, a resident of Nawada, was arrested as the driver of a car from which police recovered 65 litres of illicit mahua liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband and was …

Dhanraj @ Dhanraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that on 20 July 2025 the accused, including the petitioners, formed a …

Dr. Kiran Kumari @ Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dr. Kiran Kumari, a registered medical practitioner, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the death of an informant's wife who was initially treated in her clinic. The petitioner contended that the patient was …

Nagendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are relatives of alleged co-accused Bittu Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged kidnapping of a girl. The victim, however, recorded a statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. denying …

Satendra Yadav @ Jamuna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satendra Yadav was apprehended of arrest in a FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, stemming from a land dispute that led to violent clashes. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, the FIR was lodged after an undue five‑day delay, and that …

Motilal SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Motilal Sharma and Shamim Mian, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR only implicates Motilal as an order‑giver with no overt act, and Shamim …

Sudhakar Singh @ Sonu Singh @ Kumar SudhakarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhakar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No. 318 of 2025) for alleged assault with an iron rod, invoking multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner asserted his innocence, claimed the injury was minor, and highlighted his clean …

Junaid Ali @ Md JunaidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Junaid Ali, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Section 65 of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a victim at her residence. The FIR alleged that the petitioner committed the rape, and the victim’s statement …

Nakul Mahto @ Nakul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Nakul Mahto, accused of theft along with co-accused Neeraj Kumar, was charged under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with Section 317(2) later added. The informant claimed to have identified the petitioner. Fearing arrest, the petitioner applied for anticipatory bail. The …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rita Devi and Manjesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, robbery and threats. The FIR alleged that on 24‑01‑2025 the petitioners, along with ten unknown armed persons, attacked an …

Manikant SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manikant Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Singh, while holding a farsa, struck an informant on the head causing severe injury during a land‑related …

Shravan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shravan Kumar was arrested in connection with the recovery of 523.995 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He filed an anticipatory bail application, which the petition mistakenly omitted to label as such, and …

Pankaj Poddar @ Pankaj PodarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pankaj Poddar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 152.72 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a shop owned by Barun Kumar, and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, had no involvement with the shop or co‑accused, and …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 388.5 litres of illicit liquor were seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner contended he had no possession and was …

Ram Parvesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Ram Parvesh Rai, Kanti Devi and Vijanti Devi – sought bail in a dowry‑death case where the deceased’s husband had already been granted bail. They were alleged to have participated in the torture and killing of the informant’s daughter for dowry, under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the …

Santosh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Santosh Sah was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing a grievous head injury. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the allegations were not serious enough to warrant detention. The court examined the …

Pintu SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pintu Sah, was implicated in a case registered under sections 61(2) and 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 25(1‑b)/a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that, based on secret information, a raid recovered a large quantity of arms and ammunition …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raja Kumar filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 73242 of 2025, which had been dismissed for default due to non‑compliance with an order dated 07‑11‑2025. The High Court examined whether the dismissal could be set aside despite the default. Relying on …

Vinay Chaudhary @ Vinay ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinay Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 8 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of or control over the liquor found in the …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, feared arrest in an excise case where 801 litres of illicit liquor were seized and he was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He pleaded innocence and applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had not been arrested …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, was arrested during a police raid that recovered 280 litres of cough syrup from a tempo and 750 litres from a godown, and is charged under Sections 30(a), 30(g), 32, 56(b) and 62 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contends that he was merely a passerby, has no …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh RoyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 22.5 litres of illicit liquor were seized from his joint family house. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he had no connection with the seized liquor, but the …

Naresh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Sah, who was in custody since 17 November 2025, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police raided a hut behind his house and recovered 7.125 litres of foreign liquor. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jitendra Kumar was arrested in connection with a seizure of 230.14 litres of foreign liquor and related items under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed to be merely a labourer with no ownership of the seized car and asserted no involvement in the illicit consignment, …

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 43 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open place, he had no involvement, and he …

Bhulan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhulan Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 50 litres of illicit country‑made liquor from a public ghat. The prosecution’s case relied on secret information and informants who identified the …

BITTU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar and Akhilesh Sahani, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 160 litres of illicit liquor. They contended that they were not caught at the scene, no contraband was found on …

Saukhin Rawat @ Saukhim RawatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saukhin Rawat, was arrested in connection with a raid that recovered 57.5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from the village of Sargatti, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely a passerby and had been …

Baban RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Baban Rai, who has been in custody since 12 November 2025, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 50 litres of country-made liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed he was unaware of the liquor and was falsely implicated, …

Bhim Manjhi @ Jainath Manjhi @ Jaynath ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhim Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 20 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from the outside of his house. He contended that he was innocent, that the liquor was in a …

Subodh Kumar @ Subhodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subodh Kumar, who was in custody, applied for bail in an excise case (Case No. 3160 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 210 litres of illicit liquor were recovered and he was apprehended at the scene. The petitioner claimed he was merely a passerby and had no …

Md. NazirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Nazir, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 360 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that he has a …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Golu Kumar and Amarnath Kumar, were arrested as driver and co‑driver of a vehicle from which 225 litres of foreign liquor was seized, and were charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They pleaded that they were unaware of the contraband, were …

Suman Kumar @ Soman Kumar @ Suman Gop @ Suman Kumar GopversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of mahua liquor from a motorcycle parked outside his house. He contended that the liquor was found in an open, public area …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, a driver of a tractor, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 666 litres of foreign liquor concealed under stone‑chips, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner, who has four prior criminal convictions …