Patna High Court
Pradeep Sada @ Pradip SadaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court held that there were no fresh grounds to reconsider the earlier order and therefore the bail applications were to be rejected.
Summary
The petitioners, Pradeep Sada, Pappu Sada and Raj Kumar Sada, applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court in criminal miscellaneous proceedings against the State of Bihar. Their earlier bail applications had been rejected by the same court on 15 May 2025 in Cr. Misc. Nos. 15854 and 13027 of 2025. The petitioners sought a fresh consideration of bail, arguing new grounds. The Court examined the applications and found no fresh ground to revisit its earlier order. Consequently, the Court upheld its prior decision and rejected the bail applications. The bail applications remain dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail at this stage
- Whether there are any fresh grounds to reconsider the earlier bail rejection
Subjects
- bail
- regular bail
- reconsideration
- criminal miscellaneous
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1085 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
1. Pradeep Sada @ Pradip Sada S/o Late Julum Sada R/o Village - Turki, P.S -
Baheri, District - Darbhanga
2. Pappu Sada S/o Late Julum Sada R/o Village - Turki, P.S - Baheri, District –
Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5014 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Raj Kumar Sada @ Chhotkin Sada S/o Late Bauon Sada R/o Village- Turki,
P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 1085 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanchan Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5014 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanchan Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 16-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners
was rejected vide order dated 15.05.2025 passed by this Court in
Cr. Misc. Nos. 15854 and 13027 of 2025.
3. I do not see any fresh ground to reconsider my earlier
order dated 15.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 15854 and 13027
of 2025
4. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.