Patna High Court
Tonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Tonu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, for allegedly attempting to sell a stolen mobile phone. He claimed innocence and sought bail, acknowledging a prior criminal antecedent in another case. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court considered the facts, the petitioner’s antecedent, and the seriousness of the offences, and ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. The Court imposed conditions that the petitioner must attend the police station every Sunday and that his antecedent be verified before accepting the bail bonds. The order is limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, considering his prior criminal antecedent.
- Whether the conditions imposed (surety amount, attendance requirement, verification of antecedent) are appropriate for the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 — s. 303(2), 317(2)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
- Section 303(2)
- Section 317(2)
- antecedent
- surety
- attendance condition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21169 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-598 Year-2025 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna
======================================================
Tonu kumar Son of Raju Saw Resident of village- Behind Malasalami
Railway Line, Ps- Malsalami Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jai Narain Thakur
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Malsalami P.S. Case No. 598 of 2025 registered for the offence
under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and
other accused person were caught when they were trying to sell
stolen mobile phone.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 23.11.2025. He
further submits that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent
bearing Malsalami P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21169 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
2/3
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let
the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned
Court below in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 598 of
2025.
7. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after
being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at
Malsalami Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any
default in appearance at the police station will result in
cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
8. As the petitioner claims to have one antecedent, the
Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is
directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the
petitioner is found to be involved in any other case except the
present case and the one mentioned in paragraph no. 4 of this
order then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.
9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made
herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21169 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
3/3
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…