Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Rohit Kumar was arrested on 29 January 2026 in connection with a case of illicit country-made liquor seized from the field of Sanjay Singh, where police alleged he and another person were involved in transporting 194.7 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed he has a clean antecedent, was not found in possession of the liquor, and was implicated only on suspicion. He also contended that the investigation failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Suppression) Act, 2023. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Liquor Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The High Court, noting the petitioner’s clean record, lack of personal recovery, and procedural lapses, granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the alleged involvement in illicit liquor trafficking under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Liquor Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.
  • Whether the failure to comply with Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Suppression) Act, 2023, warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of personal recovery of liquor justify granting bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • BNSS 2023
  • criminal antecedent
  • procedural non‑compliance
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22354 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2026 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Kumar Son of Sohan Singh Resident of Village- Erka, P.S.- Kutumba,
                 District- Aurangabad

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   29.01.2026 in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 22 of

                   2026 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Liquor Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

                               3. The prosecution case in brief is that one Miku

                   Kumar, S.I police Kutumba gave himself statement before

                   officer in Charge Kutumba Police Station on 28.1.2026 alleging

                   therein that the alleged date of occurrence at 10.30 hours he was

                   on Gusty Duty along with his police party then at 12.20 hours

                   received secret information that liquor is being transported by

                   tempu to the village Chakwa and hidden the said liquor in the

                   field of Sanjay Singh under paddy straw then the said
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22354 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            2/4




          information he along with his police party reached there and

          saw that a tempu was parked in the field and said to have seeing

          the police party ,two persons got down from Tempo and started

          running away. There after with help of police the said two

          persons were apprehended who disclosed their name Rohit

          Kumar and prince Kumar and on search said to have 194.7

          litters illicit country made liquor was recovered in the field from

          straw lying in the field of Sanjay Singh. Thereafter seizure list

          has prepared.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and is innocent and he has

          falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for

          the petitioner submits that it appears from the FIR that

          altogether 194.7 litters illicit country made liquor was recovered

          from the field of Sanjay Singh and petitioner has been made an

          accused on the basis of suspicion and there is non-compliance of

          mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023

          and petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2026.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the fact that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22354 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            3/4




          nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner

          and the recovery has been made from the field of Sanjay Singh

          and there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of

          Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, let the petitioner, above named,

          be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions

          Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.-1,

          Aurangabad in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 22 of

          2026, subject to the following conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

          criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22354 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.