Patna High Court
Kamla ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and the conditions stipulated by the Court.
Summary
Kamla Manjhi was arrested on 22 February 2026 for alleged possession of 50 litres of illegal liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the seizure was made at the place of occurrence, and that the prosecution’s witnesses were Home Guard personnel, thereby violating mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023. The State opposed bail, contending the seriousness of the offence. The Court, after considering the facts, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents. The bail order was directed to be implemented by the Special Excise Judge, Saran.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act considering alleged procedural lapses under Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the nature of the seizure justify bail despite the seriousness of the offence.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a)
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 103, 105
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illegal liquor
- Section 30(a)
- procedural compliance
- BNSS 2023
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31458 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran
======================================================
Kamla Manjhi S/o Lalu Manjhi R/o Village - Jigna, P.S. -. Garkha, Dist. -
Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-05-2026 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
22.02.2026 in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 48 of
2026 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a)of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the
allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 50 liters of
illegal liquor from the possession of the apprehended accused.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has clean antecedent and it appears from the FIR and
seizure list that recovery has been made from the place of
occurrence and petitioner has been made an accused in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31458 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
2/3
present case merely on the basis of suspicion. It is next
submitted that from perusal of the seizure list it appears that the
seizure list witnesses are Bihar Home Guard personnel so there
is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and
105 of BNSS, 2023 and petitioner is in custody since
22.02.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of
Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-3rd, Saran at Chapra in
connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026, subject
to the following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31458 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
3/3
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.