Patna High Court
Raj Kumar Sada @ Chhotkin SadaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The bail applications are rejected as no fresh ground for reconsideration is shown.
Summary
The petitioners, Pradeep Sada, Pappu Sada and Raj Kumar Sada, applied for regular bail in two criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from PS Case No. 318 of 2024. Their earlier applications for bail had been rejected by this Court on 15 May 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 15854 and 13027 of 2025. The petitioners sought a fresh consideration of the bail orders, claiming new grounds for release. The Court examined the submissions and found that the petitioners had not raised any fresh ground that was not previously considered. Consequently, the Court held that there was no basis to revisit the earlier orders. The bail applications were therefore upheld in their rejection, and the petitioners remained in custody.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners have raised any fresh ground to justify reconsideration of the earlier regular bail orders dated 15 May 2025.
Subjects
- bail
- regular bail
- fresh ground
- criminal procedure
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1085 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
1. Pradeep Sada @ Pradip Sada S/o Late Julum Sada R/o Village - Turki, P.S -
Baheri, District - Darbhanga
2. Pappu Sada S/o Late Julum Sada R/o Village - Turki, P.S - Baheri, District –
Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5014 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Raj Kumar Sada @ Chhotkin Sada S/o Late Bauon Sada R/o Village- Turki,
P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 1085 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanchan Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5014 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanchan Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 16-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners
was rejected vide order dated 15.05.2025 passed by this Court in
Cr. Misc. Nos. 15854 and 13027 of 2025.
3. I do not see any fresh ground to reconsider my earlier
order dated 15.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 15854 and 13027
of 2025
4. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U T
Checking your session…