Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lal Ji MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Lal Ji Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 500 ml of illicit liquor was seized from a pick‑up van in which he was present. He claimed innocence, stating he neither owned the vehicle nor had any knowledge of the liquor, and highlighted his clean antecedents and prolonged custody since 5 November 2025. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The court considered the petitioner’s lack of prior convictions, his willingness to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and the fact that he had been in custody for several months. Weighing these factors, the court granted bail subject to conditions including personal appearance at each trial date, a close relative as one surety, and provisions for cancellation upon breach or future similar offences. The order also directed that the bail bond be accepted upon receipt of the deposit with the Advocate Association of Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering the nature of the offence and the petitioner’s custody status

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • illegal liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • surety
  • custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89559 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Lal Ji Mahto S/o Haltu Mahto R/o Village- Satjora, P.S.- Daraundha, District-
                 Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Krishna Kumar Yadav, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-01-2026                   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection

                   with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, total 500 ml. of illilcit

                   liquor was recovered from a Bolero Pick-up van and three persons

                   were apprehended including the petitioner.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

                   It has further been submitted that the petitioner has no concern

                   with the seized liquor. Learned counsel has further been submitted

                   that the petitioner is not the owner of the seized Pick-up van and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89559 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                            2/3




          no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the

          petitioner. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean

          antecedent and he is in custody since 05.11.2025.

                        5. The petitioner is willing and undertakes to deposit a

          sum of Rs. 2,500/- with the Advocate Association, Patna High

          Court.

                        6. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                        7. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of

          the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner has remained

          in custody since 05.11.2025, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection Janta Bazar P.S. Case No.

          271 of 2025, subject to the following terms and conditions :-

                        (i) One of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

          petitioner.

                        (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present before

          the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial and shall

          cooperate in the investigation.

                        (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

          violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89559 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

                                  (iv) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved

                     in similar nature of offence(s), the prosecution shall be at liberty to

                     move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                                  (v) The trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of

                     the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the

                     petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the trial court

                     shall take necessary steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

                     petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

                     above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

                     the name of verification.

                                  8. The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by

                     the learned Trial Court on showing receipt of deposit of aforesaid

                     amount with the Advocate Association, Patna High Court.

                                  9. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

                                  10. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in

                     this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.