Patna High Court
IndiaversusAfcons Infrastructure Limited
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The appeal was deemed infructuous and disposed of because the appellants had already paid the full award amount.
Summary
The Union of India and related railway authorities appealed against a condition imposed by the trial court that they deposit 80% of the arbitration award in Miscellaneous Arbitration Case No. 37 of 2018. The respondents, Afcons Infrastructure Limited, informed the court that the appellants had already paid the entire award amount. The appellants did not dispute this payment. Since the full award had been satisfied, the condition to deposit 80% became moot. The court held that the appeal had become infructuous. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without further adjudication.
Issues considered
- Whether the condition imposed by the trial court to deposit 80% of the arbitration award is enforceable against the appellants
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Award payment
- Deposit condition
- Appeal infructuous
- Railway
- Commercial appeal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.2 of 2020
======================================================
1. Union of India, the Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New
Delhi-110 001.
2. The Chairman, Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New
Delhi-110 001.
3. The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, District- Vaishali
(Bihar), Pin-844 101.
4. The Chief Engineer, East Central Railway, Mahendrughat, District-Patna,
Pin-800 004.
5. The Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction, East Central Railway,
Mahendrughat, District-Patna, Pin-800 004.
... ... Appellants
Versus
Afcons Infrastructure Limited a company registered under Companies Act,
1956 with its registered office situated in the State of Maharasthra at Afcons
House, 16, Shah Industrial Estate, Veera Desai Road, Azad Nagar Post
Office, P.O. Box No. 17978, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 053, through its
Authorized Signatory Mr. G.C. Sinha Roy, AGM (Execution).
... ... Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :
For the UoI : Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Senior CGC
Mr. Anwar Karim, CGC
Mr. Abhishek Aanand, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Raju Giri, Senior Advocate
Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
4 05-01-2026 Mr. Raju Giri, learned Senior Counsel for the
Respondent has informed this Court that during pendency of the
present appeal, the appellants have already paid the entire award
amount. It is not disputed by learned counsel for the appellants.
2. So far as this appeal is concerned, it was filed
limited to a challenge to the condition put by the learned court
Patna High Court COMMERCIAL APP No.2 of 2020(4) dt.05-01-2026
2/2
hearing the Miscellaneous (Arbitration) Case No. 37 of 2018 to
deposit 80% of the awarded amount.
3. Since the payment has already been paid, this
appeal has become infructuous and is being disposed of
accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
(Shailendra Singh, J)
lekhi/-
U
Checking your session…