Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

India through the General Manager, East Central Railway,versusM/s Kamal Construction, a partnership firm

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to approach the appropriate forum.

Summary

The Union of India (through the General Manager, East Central Railway) appealed against M/s Kamal Construction in the Patna High Court. The respondent raised a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the appeal. The appellant, through senior counsel, subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal and to re‑file it before a suitable forum. The court entertained this request, noting no objection from the respondent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the appellant to seek appropriate relief elsewhere. All other contentions were left to the parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal is maintainable before the Patna High Court
  • Whether an appellant may withdraw an appeal and re‑file it before another forum

Subjects

  • appeal withdrawal
  • maintainability
  • commercial appeal
  • high court procedure
  • preliminary objection

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.20 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur,
                 District- Vaishali (Bihar).

                                                                          ... ... Appellant/s
                                                 Versus
                 M/s Kamal Construction, a partnership firm through, P.O.A. Holder Shri
                 Subodh Kumar Singh, Mehadauli, Begusarai, District- Begusarai (Bihar).

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :     Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate
                                              Mr.Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Apurv Yash, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
                         and
                         HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

4   25-03-2026                   I.A. No.1 of 2026

                                In the hearing dated 17.03.2026, Mr. Satyabir Bharti,

                   learned senior counsel for the appellant took some time to

                   respond to the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the

                   respondent.

                                2. The objection relates to the very maintainability of

                   the present appeal in the High Court.

                                3. Today, learned senior counsel for the appellant

                   submits, on instruction, that the appellant may be allowed to

                   withdraw the appeal from this Court and he may be allowed to

                   present the same before the appropriate court.

                                4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no
           Patna High Court COMMERCIAL APP No.20 of 2025(4) dt.25-03-2026
                                                    2/2




                    objection to the same.

                                5. Keeping in view the aforementioned submissions,

                    the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the

                    appellant to seek its remedy before the appropriate forum/court

                    as may be advised. All the contentions are left upon to the

                    parties.

                                6. Accordingly, the appeal as well as Interlocutory

                    Application stand disposed of.



                                         (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)


                                             ( Soni Shrivastava, J)
arvind/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.