Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

LAL MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal is abated and disposed of due to the appellant's death and lack of application by a near relative.

Summary

The appellant, Lal Mohammad, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as reported by the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the police inspector. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal may be abated if no near relative files an application for leave to continue it. No such application was filed. Consequently, the Court held that the appeal could not proceed and ordered it to be abated and disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal can continue after the death of the appellant in the absence of an application by a near relative for leave to continue the appeal.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Appeal
  • Abatement
  • Death of Appellant
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • Procedural Law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.104 of 2000
                  ======================================================
                  Lal Mohammad Son of late Mojeeb Mian Resident of Village Khiriyavan,
                  Police Station Madanpur.

                                                                                ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
                  State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Appellant/s      :       Mr.Kartik Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s     :       Km. Shashi Bala Verma, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                  PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER
                  (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3    27-02-2026                    Perused the Letter No.476 dated 12.02.2026 of the Deputy

                    Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad along with the report of Police

                    Inspector cum SHO, Madanpur police station, Aurangabad dated

                    10.02.2026, wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to

                    light that the sole appellant Lal Mohammad, has died.

                                   2. In view of the said letter as also section 394 of the Code

                    of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to section 435 of the

                    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, since no near relative has

                    filed any application for leave to continue the appeal, the Criminal

                    Appeal stands abated and disposed of.



                                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                        (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
ranjan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.