Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAJENDRA MAHTO and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The criminal appeal stands abated and is disposed of as no near relative applied for leave to continue the appeal after the death of the appellants.

Summary

The appellants, Rajendra Mahto and Makun Mahto, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the police investigation revealed that both appellants had died, and death certificates were produced. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Pursuant to Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), the court held that the appeal could not proceed and was therefore abated. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of, and the trial court record was ordered to be sent back to the concerned court.

Issues considered

  • The appeal can continue despite the death of the appellant(s) when no relative seeks leave to proceed.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abatement
  • death of appellant
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • procedural law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.1052 of 2008
                 ======================================================
                 1. Rajendra Mahto, S/o late Aklu Mahto
                 2. Makun Mahto, S/o late Nanku @ Nanki Mahto
                 Both R/o Vill. Sherpur Narsari Barbatta, P.S. Sarairanjan, District Samastipur

                                                                              ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                 STATE OF BIHAR

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :       Mr. Sachchidanand Choudhary, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. G.P. Jaiswal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

3   08-05-2026                   Perused the Letter No. 469 dated 26.04.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Samastipur along with the report

                   dated 24.04.2026 of the Assistant Superintendent of Police

                   -cum-S.H.O., Sarairanjan, wherein it is indicated that during

                   enquiry, it came to light that both the appellants, namely,

                   Rajendra Mahto and Makun Mahto, are dead and the death

                   certificate of both the appellants is annexed with the said report.

                               2. In view of the said report as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal, the Criminal Appeal stands abated and
            Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.1052 of 2008(3) dt.08-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      disposed of.

                                   3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the

                      concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                           (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                  (Harish Kumar, J)
shailendra/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.