Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SHAKUNTALA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal abated due to the appellant's death, the fine was set aside, and the imprisonment sentence was deemed abated.

Summary

Shakuntala Devi, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed her sentence. While the appeal was pending, she died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) to continue the appeal. The Court held that the appeal abated upon her death, and consequently set aside the discretionary fine imposed by the trial court. The imprisonment portion of the sentence was also deemed abated, and the appeal was disposed of in its entirety.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the appellant's death on a pending criminal appeal?
  • Whether a discretionary fine imposed on conviction can be set aside when the appellant dies?
  • Whether the appeal can proceed without a near relative filing an application under Sec. 394/435 of the CrPC?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • death of appellant
  • abated appeal
  • discretionary fine
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • Section 435 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.122 of 2008
                 ======================================================
                 Shakuntala Devi, wife of Ganga Prasad Mahton, Resident of Village- Patla,
                 Police Station- Khodawanpur, District- Begusarai

                                                                                ... ... Appellant

                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :         Mr. Abhay Shanker Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :         Smt. Shashi Bala Verma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

3   26-05-2026                 Perused      the     report     dated    05.05.2026    of    the

                   Superintendent of Police, Begusarai along with the report dated

                   02.05.2026 of         the      Sub-Inspector    of    Police-cum-S.H.O.,

                   Chhaurahi Police Station, Begusarai, which indicate that the

                   sole appellant Shakuntala Devi is dead and the death certificate

                   of the appellant is annexed with the said report.

                               2. In view of the said reports as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.122 of 2008(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                            2/3




          law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

          Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

          v. State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974, wherein

          it has been categorically held that upon conviction under

          Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the imposition of

          fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake the character

          of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position affirmed by

          the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at

          Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble v. State of Maharashtra,

          reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being in consonance

          therewith, and whereas the appellant has since expired during

          the pendency of the present appeal and the conviction sought to

          be assailed pertains to the year 2007, and the State does not

          intend to pursue the recovery of the fine amount as imposed by

          the learned Trial Court, this Court, upon due consideration of

          the aforesaid facts, circumstances and settled legal position,

          hereby sets aside the order of imposition of fine passed by the

          learned Trial Court, and since the appeal insofar as it pertains to

          the sentence of imprisonment stands abated consequent upon the

          demise of the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of as

          having abated in its entirety.

                       3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the
           Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.122 of 2008(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.



                                          (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
shailendra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.