Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAJENDRA DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal abated due to the appellant's death, and the discretionary fine imposed under Section 302 IPC was set aside.

Summary

The appellant, Rajendra Das, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the CPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) and held that a criminal appeal abates upon the death of the appellant. Relying on precedents that the fine under Section 302 is discretionary, the Court set aside the fine imposed by the trial court. Since the imprisonment portion of the sentence also became moot, the appeal was disposed of as fully abated and the trial court records were ordered to be sent back.

Issues considered

  • The effect of the appellant's death on a pending criminal appeal.
  • Whether the fine imposed under Section 302 IPC is mandatory or discretionary.
  • Whether a discretionary fine can be set aside when the appellant has died.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • death of appellant
  • abated appeal
  • Section 302 IPC
  • discretionary fine
  • CPC 394
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 435
  • sentencing

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.1274 of 2010
                 ======================================================
                 Rajendra Das Son of Late Bhagendra Das, resident of village– Morbatoli
                 Rajkha, Rampur, Police Station – Tajpur, District Samastipur.


                                                                           ... ... Appellant/s

                                                  Versus

                 The State of Bihar.


                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :     Mr. Chandra Mauli Prasad Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

3   26-05-2026                    Perused the Letter No. 832 dated 09.05.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, along with the Report

                   dated 07.05.2026 of the S.H.O., Tajpur Police Station,

                   Samastipur as well as the Death Certificate, which was issued

                   by the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of

                   Bihar; wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to light

                   that the sole appellant, namely, Rajendra Das, is dead.

                               2. In view of the said letter as also Section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.1274 of 2010(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                            2/3




          continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of

          law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

          Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

          -Vrs.- State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974,

          wherein it has been categorically held that upon conviction

          under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the

          imposition of fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake

          the character of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position

          affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of

          Judicature at Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble -Vrs.- State of

          Maharashtra, reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being

          in consonance therewith, and whereas the appellant has since

          expired during the pendency of the present appeal and the

          conviction sought to be assailed pertains to the year 2010, and

          the State does not intend to pursue the recovery of the fine

          amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court, this Court , upon

          due consideration of the aforesaid facts, circumstances and

          settled legal position, hereby sets aside the order of imposition

          of fine passed by the learned Trial Court, and since the appeal

          insofar as it pertains to the sentence of imprisonment stands

          abated consequent upon the demise of the appellant, the present

          appeal is disposed of as having abated in its entirety.
         Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.1274 of 2010(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                                     3/3




                                3. Let the trial court records be sent back to the

                   concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                               (Harish Kumar, J)
Neha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.