Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

GHURAN TANTIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal abates due to the appellant's death, and the discretionary fine is set aside while the imprisonment sentence is considered abated.

Summary

Ghuran Tanti, convicted under Section 302 IPC, appealed his sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, police reports confirmed his death and a death certificate was produced. No relative filed an application to continue the appeal, invoking Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). The Court held that the appeal abates upon the appellant's death and, following precedent that fines in murder convictions are discretionary, set aside the fine imposed by the trial court. The imprisonment portion of the sentence was deemed abated, and the appeal was disposed of as fully abated.

Issues considered

  • Does an appeal abate upon the death of the appellant under Section 394 CrPC?
  • Is the fine imposed under a conviction for murder (Section 302 IPC) discretionary and subject to being set aside?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • appeal abatement
  • death of appellant
  • Section 302 IPC
  • discretionary fine
  • CrPC Section 394
  • criminal appeal
  • sentencing

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.154 of 2008
                 ======================================================
                 Ghuran Tanti, son of Lemo Tanti, resident of Village- Tatan, P.S.- Bakhari,
                 District- Begusarai, at present Resident of Village- Sansa, P.S.- Naw Kothi,
                 District- Begusarai

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant

                                                     Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant     :         Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent    :         Smt. Shashi Bala Verma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

4   26-05-2026                 Perused     the    report      dated   18.05.2026        of    the

                   Superintendent of Police, Begusarai along with the report dated

                   16.05.2026 of the S.H.O., Neema Chandpura Police Station,

                   Begusarai, which indicate that the sole appellant Ghuran Tanti is

                   dead and the death certificate of the appellant is annexed with

                   the said report.

                               2. In view of the said reports as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appealand having regard to the settled position of
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.154 of 2008(4) dt.26-05-2026
                                            2/3




          law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

          Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

          v. State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974, wherein

          it has been categorically held that upon conviction under

          Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the imposition of

          fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake the character

          of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position affirmed by

          the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at

          Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble v. State of Maharashtra,

          reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being in consonance

          therewith, and whereas the appellant has since expired during

          the pendency of the present appeal and the conviction sought to

          be assailed pertains to the year 2008, and the State does not

          intend to pursue the recovery of the fine amount as imposed by

          the learned Trial Court, this Court, upon due consideration of

          the aforesaid facts, circumstances and settled legal position,

          hereby sets aside the order of imposition of fine passed by the

          learned Trial Court, and since the appeal insofar as it pertains to

          the sentence of imprisonment stands abated consequent upon the

          demise of the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of as

          having abated in its entirety.

                       3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the
           Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.154 of 2008(4) dt.26-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.



                                          (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
shailendra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.