Patna High Court
DWARIKA MAHTOversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- ABATED
Holding
The appeal abated due to the appellant's death, and the discretionary fine imposed under the murder conviction was set aside.
Summary
The appellant, Dwarika Mahto, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and appealed the conviction. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, and no near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), which provides for abatement of appeals upon the death of the appellant. Relying on precedents that held the fine imposed in a murder conviction is discretionary, the Court set aside the trial court's fine order and disposed of the appeal as abated in its entirety. The trial court records were directed to be sent back to the concerned court.
Issues considered
- Does the death of an appellant automatically abate a criminal appeal when no relative seeks leave to continue?
- Is the fine imposed in a conviction under Section 302 IPC mandatory or discretionary?
- Can the fine be set aside when the State does not intend to recover it?
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 435
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 394
- Indian Penal Code — s. 302
Subjects
- appeal abatement
- death of appellant
- discretionary fine
- murder conviction
- criminal procedure
- sentencing
- fine remission
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.216 of 2011
======================================================
Dwarika Mahto Son Of Late Chamari Mahto Resident Of Village Jaitiya,
Police Station Khudaganj, District Nalanda ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3 26-05-2026 Perused the Letter No. 1496 dated 16.05.2026 of the
Superintendent of Police, Nalanda along with the Report dated
16.05.2026 of the S.H.O, Khudaganj Police Station, Nalanda,
wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to light that
the sole appellant, namely, Dwarika Mahto, is dead.
2. In view of the said letter as also Section 394 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to
Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,
since no near relative has filed any application for leave to
continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of
law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High
Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal
-Vrs.- State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974,
wherein it has been categorically held that upon conviction
under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the
imposition of fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake
the character of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.216 of 2011(3) dt.26-05-2026
2/2
affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of
Judicature at Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble -Vrs.- State of
Maharashtra, reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being
in consonance therewith, and whereas the appellant has since
expired during the pendency of the present appeal and the
conviction sought to be assailed pertains to the year 2011, and
the State does not intend to pursue the recovery of the fine
amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court, this Court , upon
due consideration of the aforesaid facts, circumstances and
settled legal position, hereby sets aside the order of imposition
of fine passed by the learned Trial Court, and since the appeal
insofar as it pertains to the sentence of imprisonment stands
abated consequent upon the demise of the appellant(s), the
present appeal is disposed of as having abated in its entirety.
3. Let the trial court records be sent back to the
concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.
(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)
(Harish Kumar, J)
Neha/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.