Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAMJI SINGH and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The criminal appeal stands abated and is disposed of due to the death of the appellants without any application for leave to continue.

Summary

The appeal filed by Ramji Singh and Shubh Narain Thakur was pending before the Patna High Court when both appellants died, as evidenced by death certificates. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined the reports of the investigating officers and noted the statutory provisions governing abatement of criminal appeals upon the death of the appellant. Relying on Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Court held that the appeal could not proceed without a petition from a near relative. Consequently, the appeal was declared abated and disposed, and the trial court records were ordered to be sent back to the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal may continue after the death of the appellant in the absence of an application by a near relative.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • appeal abatement
  • death of appellant
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • Section 435 B.N.S.
  • high court order
  • procedural law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.30 of 1997
                 ======================================================
                 1.Ramji Singh Son of Jugal Singh, Resident of Village-Pratap Pur, P.S. Karja,
                 District-Muzaffarpur.
                 2. Shubh Narain Thakur, Son of Sharda Thakur, Resident of Village-Kushi,
                 P.S. Kanti, District-Muzaffarpur.

                                                                              ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                 State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :       Mr.S. B. K. Mangalam, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :       Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

8   01-05-2026                    Perused the report of the SHO, Karja Police Station,

                   Muzaffarpur dated 16.12.2025 as well as report of Police

                   Inspector cum SHO,            Kanti Police Station , Muzaffarpur,

                   wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to light that

                   both the appellants Ramji Singh and Shubh Narain Thakur, have

                   died. Death certificate of appellant no. 1 Ramji Singh issued by

                   Department of Planning and Development as well as certificate

                   of death of appellant no. 2 Shubh Narain Thakur issued by Ward

                   Councillor of Nagar Parishad, Ward No. 21 of Kanti,

                   Muzaffapur have been enclosed with the said reports.

                                  2. In view of the said letter as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to
           Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.30 of 1997(8) dt.01-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                     since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                     continue the appeal, the Criminal Appeal stands abated and

                     disposed of.

                                  3. Let the trial court records be sent back to the

                     concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.



                                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)



                                                              (Harish Kumar, J)

ranjan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.