Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

JAI RAM RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal is abated due to the appellant's death, the discretionary fine is set aside, and the appeal is disposed of in its entirety.

Summary

The appellant, Jai Ram Rai, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction and sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no near relative filed an application to continue the appeal. The Court noted that the fine imposed on conviction is discretionary, citing precedents, and therefore set aside the fine. Since the appellant’s death abates the imprisonment sentence, the Court held that the appeal is wholly abated and disposed of.

Issues considered

  • The effect of the appellant's death on a pending criminal appeal under CrPC Section 394/BNSS Section 435.
  • Whether a discretionary fine imposed on conviction can be set aside upon the appellant's death.
  • Whether the appeal can proceed without a near relative filing an application for leave to continue the appeal.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • death of appellant
  • abated appeal
  • discretionary fine
  • Section 302 IPC
  • CrPC Section 394
  • BNSS Section 435
  • conviction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.375 of 2010
                 ======================================================
                 Jai Ram Rai, son of late Kaushal Rai R/o,Vill.-Samharia,P.S.-Kaler,Dist.-
                 Arwal

                                                                               ... ... Appellant
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant     :         Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate
                 For the Respondent    :         Smt. Shashi Bala Verma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

4   26-05-2026                 Perused     the    report      dated   18.05.2026     of    the

                   Superintendent of Police, Arwal along with the report dated

                   18.05.2026 of the S.H.O., Kaler Police Station, Arwal, which

                   indicate that the sole appellant Jai Ram Rai is dead and the

                   death certificate of the appellant is annexed with the said report.

                               2. In view of the said reports as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.375 of 2010(4) dt.26-05-2026
                                            2/3




          law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

          Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

          v. State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974, wherein

          it has been categorically held that upon conviction under

          Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the imposition of

          fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake the character

          of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position affirmed by

          the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at

          Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble v. State of Maharashtra,

          reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being in consonance

          therewith, and whereas the appellant has since expired during

          the pendency of the present appeal and the conviction sought to

          be assailed pertains to the year 2010, and the State does not

          intend to pursue the recovery of the fine amount as imposed by

          the learned Trial Court, this Court, upon due consideration of

          the aforesaid facts, circumstances and settled legal position,

          hereby sets aside the order of imposition of fine passed by the

          learned Trial Court, and since the appeal insofar as it pertains to

          the sentence of imprisonment stands abated consequent upon the

          demise of the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of as

          having abated in its entirety.

                       3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the
           Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.375 of 2010(4) dt.26-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.



                                          (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
shailendra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.