Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

BHUSHAN GIRIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal abated due to the appellant's death, and the fine order was set aside as discretionary.

Summary

Bhushan Giri, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, and a death certificate was submitted. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal abates if the appellant dies and no near relative seeks leave to continue it. The Court, relying on precedents that a fine in a Section 302 conviction is discretionary, set aside the trial court's fine order. Since the imprisonment portion of the sentence cannot be executed against a deceased person, the appeal was disposed as fully abated.

Issues considered

  • The effect of the appellant's death on a pending criminal appeal.
  • Whether the fine imposed in a conviction under Section 302 IPC is mandatory or discretionary.
  • Whether a near relative can seek leave to continue the appeal after the appellant's death.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • death of appellant
  • abated appeal
  • fine discretion
  • Section 302 IPC
  • CrPC Section 394
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • conviction
  • sentencing

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.471 of 2001
                 ======================================================
                 Bhushan Giri, Son of Devanand Giri, Resident of Village-Bihjadi, Police
                 Station-Deseri, District-Vaishali.

                                                                                ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                 State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s      :      Mr.Ajay, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s     :      Mr. Satyanarayan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

3   26-05-2026                    Perused the Letter No. 146 dated 10.02.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Vaishali along with the report of

                   Police Inspector cum S.H.O., Sahdei Police Station, Vaishali

                   dated 08.02.2026, wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it

                   came to light that the sole appellant Bhushan Giri has died.

                   Death certificate of the appellant issued by Department of

                   Planning and Development, Government of Bihar, Patna has

                   also been enclosed with the said reports.

                                  2. In view of the said letters as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.471 of 2001(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                            2/3




          law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

          Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

          -Vrs.- State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974,

          wherein it has been categorically held that upon conviction

          under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the

          imposition of fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake

          the character of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position

          affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of

          Judicature at Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble -Vrs.- State of

          Maharashtra, reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being

          in consonance therewith, and whereas the appellant has since

          expired during the pendency of the present appeal and the

          conviction sought to be assailed pertains to the year 2001, and

          the State does not intend to pursue the recovery of the fine

          amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court, this Court, upon

          due consideration of the aforesaid facts, circumstances and

          settled legal position, hereby sets aside the order of imposition

          of fine passed by the learned Trial Court, and since the appeal

          insofar as it pertains to the sentence of imprisonment stands

          abated consequent upon the demise of the appellant, the present

          appeal is disposed of as having abated in its entirety.

                       3. Let the trial court records be sent back to the
           Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.471 of 2001(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     concerned court immediately, if not required in any other case.



                                          (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
ranjan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.