Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SHIV SAGAR RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal is abated due to the appellant's death, and the fine order is set aside as discretionary.

Summary

Shiv Sagar Rai appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC, which included a fine, before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and no near relative filed an application to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) regarding abatement of criminal appeals upon death, and noted that a fine imposed on conviction is discretionary, not mandatory, as held in Santosh Kumar Baranwal v. State of UP and Gopala Balu Kamble v. State of Maharashtra. Since the State did not intend to recover the fine and the appellant was deceased, the Court set aside the fine order and held that the appeal was wholly abated. The appeal was therefore disposed of as abated in its entirety, and the trial court records were to be sent back.

Issues considered

  • The effect of the appellant's death on a pending criminal appeal.
  • Whether the fine imposed under a conviction for murder is mandatory or discretionary.
  • Whether an appeal can proceed without a near relative filing an application for leave to continue.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abatement
  • death of appellant
  • discretionary fine
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • sentencing

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.792 of 2010
                 ======================================================
                 Shiv Sagar Rai, Son of Chandar Rai, resident of village Saidabad, Police
                 Station- Raghopur, District – Vaishali.                   ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State Of Bihar                                  ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :      Mr. P.C.Yadav, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

3   26-05-2026                    Perused the Letter No. 739 dated 12.05.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Vaishali along with the Report dated

                   28.04.2026 of the S.H.O, Raghopur Police Station, Vaishali,

                   wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to light that

                   the sole appellant, namely, Shiv Sagar Rai, is dead.

                               2. In view of the said letter as also Section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal and having regard to the settled position of

                   law as enunciated by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High

                   Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Santosh Kumar Baranwal

                   -Vrs.- State of UP, reported in 2010 SCC OnLine All 974,

                   wherein it has been categorically held that upon conviction

                   under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the

                   imposition of fine is discretionary in nature and does not partake
         Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.792 of 2010(3) dt.26-05-2026
                                                     2/2




                   the character of a mandatory requirement, and the legal position

                   affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court of

                   Judicature at Bombay in Gopala Balu Kamble -Vrs.- State of

                   Maharashtra, reported in 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1290 being

                   in consonance therewith, and whereas the appellant has since

                   expired during the pendency of the present appeal and the

                   conviction sought to be assailed pertains to the year 2010, and

                   the State does not intend to pursue the recovery of the fine

                   amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court, this Court , upon

                   due consideration of the aforesaid facts, circumstances and

                   settled legal position, hereby sets aside the order of imposition

                   of fine passed by the learned Trial Court, and since the appeal

                   insofar as it pertains to the sentence of imprisonment stands

                   abated consequent upon the demise of the appellant, the present

                   appeal is disposed of as having abated in its entirety.

                                3. Let the trial court records be sent back to the

                   concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                               (Harish Kumar, J)
Neha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.