Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAJEEV YADAV @ RAJEEV KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal stands abated and is disposed of under the provisions governing abatement upon death of the appellant.

Summary

The appellant, Rajeev Yadav, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal, and a death certificate was produced. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The court examined the relevant provisions, namely Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), which provide for abatement of proceedings upon the death of a party when no one seeks to continue them. Consequently, the court held that the appeal could not proceed and was abated. The trial court record was ordered to be sent back to the lower court. The appeal was therefore disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal abates upon the death of the appellant when no relative applies for leave to continue the appeal under the applicable statutory provisions.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abated appeal
  • death of appellant
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • Section 435 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • procedural law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.857 of 2009
                 ======================================================
                 Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Son Of Balkrishna Yadav, R/O-
                 Babhangama, P.S. Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

                                                                           ... ... Appellant/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State Of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :     Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advo
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.A.K.Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

5   06-05-2026                     Perused the Letter No. 634 dated 26.04.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Madhepura along with the report

                   dated 26.04.2026 of the S.H.O., Bihariganj P.S., wherein it is

                   indicated that during enquiry it came to light that the sole

                   appellant, namely, Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Yadav, is

                   dead and the death certificate of the appellant is annexed with

                   the said report.

                               2. In view of the said report as also section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal, the Criminal Appeal stands abated and

                   disposed of.
            Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.857 of 2009(5) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the

                      concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                           (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                  ( Harish Kumar, J)
guddukr/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.