Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAMESH SAHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal stands abated and is disposed of because the appellant is dead and no near relative applied for leave to continue.

Summary

The appellant, Ramesh Sah, was the subject of a criminal appeal (DB) No.913 of 2006 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police and local officials reported that the appellant had died. The court examined the letters and reports confirming the death. It considered Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now mirrored by Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), which provides that an appeal is abated if the appellant dies and no near relative seeks leave to continue it. Since no relative filed such an application, the court held that the appeal could not proceed. Consequently, the appeal was abated and disposed of, and the trial court record was ordered to be sent back to the concerned court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal can continue when the appellant is deceased and no near relative files an application for leave to continue the appeal

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abated appeal
  • death of appellant
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • procedural law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.913 of 2006
                 ======================================================
                 Ramesh Sah, son of Anuthilal Sah, resident of village Chandpura, P.S.
                 Deshari, District- Vaishali.

                                                                           ... ... Appellant/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate
                                               Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate
                                               Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate
                                               Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

4   11-05-2026                   Perused the Letter No.655 dated 04.05.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Vaishali along with the Report dated

                   01.05.2026 of SHO, Chandpura Police Station as well as the

                   Report dated 01.05.2026 of the Sarpanch of Gram Kachahari,

                   Rasulpur, Habib, Desari, Vaishali wherein it is indicated that

                   during enquiry it came to light that the appellant, namely,

                   Ramesh Sah, is dead.

                                2. In view of the said letters as also Section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to
             Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.913 of 2006(4) dt.11-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       continue the appeal, the Criminal Appeal stands abated and

                       disposed of.

                                    3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the

                       concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                            (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)



                                                   (Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.