Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sintu YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ABATED

Holding

The appeal is abated and disposed of as the appellant is dead and no near relative has applied for leave to continue.

Summary

The appellant, Sintu Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.920 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal may be abated if the appellant is deceased and no near relative files an application to continue it. No relative applied for leave to continue the appeal. Consequently, the court held that the appeal stands abated and ordered its disposal, directing the trial court record to be sent back to the concerned court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal can continue when the appellant is deceased and no near relative applies for leave to continue the appeal

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abated appeal
  • death of appellant
  • Section 394 CrPC
  • procedural law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.920 of 2014
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2012 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sintu Yadav Son of Bindeshwari Yadav Resident of Village - Dhorhiya, P.S -
                  Kharik, District Bhagalpur.


                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. Mayanand Jha, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

4   01-05-2026                    Perused the Letter No. 87 dated 09.02.2026 of the

                   Superintendent of Police, Naugachia along with the Report

                   dated 06.02.2026 of the S.H.O, Nadi Police Station, Bhagalpur,

                   wherein it is indicated that during enquiry it came to light that

                   the sole appellant, namely, Sintu Yadav, is dead.

                               2. In view of the said letter as also Section 394 of the

                   Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which corresponds to

                   Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,

                   since no near relative has filed any application for leave to

                   continue the appeal, the Criminal Appeal stands abated and

                   disposed of.
         Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.920 of 2014(4) dt.01-05-2026
                                                     2/2




                                3. Let the trial court record be sent back to the

                   concerned court immediately, if not required in any other cases.



                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                               (Harish Kumar, J)
Neha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.