Patna High Court
Manu Ray @ Manu Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The SC/ST Act does not apply as there is no caste-based abuse, and anticipatory bail is granted to the appellants.
Summary
The appellants, Manu Ray and Abhimanyu Ray, were charged under several IPC offences and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant while intoxicated and plucking his corn. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge. The appellants contended that the SC/ST Act was inapplicable because there was no allegation of caste-based abuse and the injuries were minor. The Patna High Court examined whether the statutory provisions of the SC/ST Act were attracted and found no caste-name insult, concluding that the act did not apply. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail, set aside the lower court’s order, and directed bail on prescribed conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged assault attracted the provisions of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of the nature of the injuries and the absence of caste-based insult.
Legislation cited
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 341, 427, 504, 506
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- SC/ST Act
- caste based offence
- assault
- criminal procedure
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1492 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2023 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran
======================================================
1. Manu Ray @ Manu Kumar Ray son of Shiv Ray @ Shivji Ray Village-
Pithauri Tawakal Tola Ps- Baniapur Dist- Saran
2. Abhimanyu Kumar Ray @ Abhimanya Ray @ Abhimananu Ray son of
Shipahi Ray Village- Pithauri Tawakal Tola Ps- Baniapur Dist- Saran
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Dinesh Manjhi son of Jagmohan Manjhi Village- Pithauri Tawnkal Tola Ps-
Baniapur Dist- Saran
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 23-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned
Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. No one appears for the Opposite party no. 2.
3. An order, dated 18.12.2023, passed by learned
Court of SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge, Chapra at Saran, in
ABP No. 4229 of 2023, is under challenge in the present appeal
preferred under Section 14-A (2) of the Schedule Caste and
Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby
the anticipatory bail application of the appellant in connection
with Baniapur Police Station Case No. 349 of 2023 registered
for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 427, 504,
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1492 of 2024(4) dt.23-02-2026
2/3
506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1)(r)(s), 3(2)
(V)(a) of the Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribe (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, has been rejected.
4. As per the prosecution case, on 21.08.2023, in the
night, the appellants were coming in drunken condition and
were plucking corn from the field of the informant, and upon
objection made by the informant, they started abusing and
appellant no. 2 assaulted the informant on his head by his metal
bangle, causing injury near his left eye and when the cousin of
the informant intervened, appellant no. 1 assaulted him with fist.
5. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
they have not committed any offence in the manner alleged.
Prima facie, the provisions of SC/ST Act is not attracted
inasmuch as there is no allegation that appellants abused the
informant by his caste name. The injuries caused to the
informant and others are simple in nature and are not serious.
6. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf
of the parties and taking into consideration the nature of
allegation and the fact that the injuries are simple in nature and
there is no allegation of abusing by the caste name in full public
view, I am inclined to grant the appellants privilege of
anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1492 of 2024(4) dt.23-02-2026
3/3
7. This appeal is, accordingly, allowed and the order,
dated 18.12.2023, passed by learned Court of SC/ST Exclusive
Special Judge, Chapra at Saran, in ABP No. 4229 of 2023, is set
aside.
8. Let the appellants, above named, in the event of
their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four
weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of SC/ST
Exclusive Special Judge, Chapra at Saran, in connection with
Baniapur Police Station Case No. 349 of 2023, subject to the
condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.