Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Baidul Khan @ Baidullah KhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The High Court set aside the lower court’s refusal and granted regular bail to the appellant, subject to conditions.

Summary

The appellant, Baidul Khan, appealed to the Patna High Court seeking regular bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the CrPC after a Special Judge had refused bail in a rape case registered under Sections 70(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant participated in the rape of the victim, while the appellant claimed innocence, asserting that the FIR was fabricated and that the victim, who had been examined as PW‑1, had turned hostile. The Special Public Prosecutor opposed bail. Considering the victim's hostile stance and the circumstances, the High Court ordered the appellant’s release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation and appearance in court. The appellate court set aside the lower court’s order and allowed the appeal.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to an accused in a rape case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the victim has turned hostile.
  • Whether the refusal of bail by the Special Judge was justified in view of the evidence and the victim's change of testimony.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • rape
  • SC/ST Act
  • victim hostile
  • CrPC Section 14A
  • high court appeal
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1816 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Baidul Khan @ Baidullah Khan S/O Faiyaz Khan @ Md. Faiyaj Khan
                 Resident of village- Chhavani @ Chhawani, ward no.- 05, P.S- Bettiah Kali
                 Bagh O.P., District- West Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    XXX D/O Lae Mohan @ Suresh Ram R/O Village- Chhavani @ Chhawani
                 Harijan Tola, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Manuwapul, Distt.- West Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr.Sujeet Kumar
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. Sadanand Paswan
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. This is the second attempt of the appellant for grant

                   of regular bail in the appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) against

                   refusal of the prayer for regular bail by order dated 30.03.2026

                   passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Rape and

                   POCSO Act, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with

                   Bettiah Mahila P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 registered under

                   Sections 70(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(2)(va)

                   of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act (Prevention

                   of Atrocities) Act.

                                3. According to the prosecution case, this appellant

                   along with other accused persons committed rape upon the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1816 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                             2/3




          victim.

                       4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

          appellant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and

          fabricated and the appellant has not committed any offence as

          alleged in the FIR. He further submits that the trial has begun

          and the victim has been examined as P.W-1 and she has not

          supported the case of the prosecution and has stated that no such

          occurrence has taken place and she has become hostile. The

          appellant is in custody since 27.11.2024.

                       5. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and also considering the fact that the victim has

          turned hostile, let the appellant, above named, be released on

          bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned concerned Court below in connection with Bettiah

          Mahila P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, subject to the condition that

          the appellant shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly

          represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall

          remain physically present as directed by the court and on his
          Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1816 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                    absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his

                    bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                 7. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and

                    this appeal stands allowed.



                                                             (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.