Patna High Court
Aklu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The appellant, Aklu Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.279 of 2026 before the Patna High Court arising from a 2025 case in Sitamarhi. The appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal, requesting liberty to approach the appropriate forum after the charges were framed. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, argued for withdrawal, while the State was represented by Mr. Binay Krishna. The bench, after hearing the submissions, granted the request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, allowing the appellant to pursue the matter elsewhere.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the criminal appeal
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn upon such permission
Subjects
- appeal withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
- dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.279 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2025 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Aklu Mahto Son of Late Neb Mahto @ Mebalal Mahto Resident of Village-
Pachgachhiya, P.S.- Bathnaha, Dist- Sitamarhi
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Reeta Devi Wife of Rajesh Paswan Resident of Village- Harpur Bhalha, ,
P.S.- Bathnaha, Dist- Sitamarhi
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 08-04-2026 Heard Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the
appellant and Mr.Binay Krishna, learned Spl.PP for the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty
to move before the appropriate forum after framing of the
charges.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Checking your session…