Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manjesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The appeal is allowed and the order denying bail is set aside, granting bail to the appellant.

Summary

Manjesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a violent attack on a brick kiln where several workers were assaulted and one was killed. The informant, Umesh Singh, alleged that the accused, identified through CCTV footage, participated in the assault, leading to charges under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S.) Act, the Arms Act, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant contended that he was merely seen fleeing, was not named by any eyewitness, and that no caste-based motive could be established, rendering the SC/ST Act charges untenable. The Special Public Prosecutor opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences and the material gathered during investigation. The Patna High Court, after considering the lack of direct identification and the general nature of the accusations, set aside the lower court’s order denying bail and granted the appellant bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the evidence, including CCTV footage and witness statements, is sufficient to justify denial of bail for the appellant.
  • Whether the alleged conduct falls within the ambit of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
  • Whether the identification of the appellant as a participant in the offence is established beyond reasonable doubt.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • CCTV evidence
  • identification
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act
  • Arms Act
  • evidence sufficiency
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3937 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA District-
                                                         Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Manjesh Kumar S/o Bambam Singh @ Bam Singh @ Shyam Kishor Singh
                 R/o vill - Bhairwar, P.s.- Lakho, Dist- Begusarai

                                                                               ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Umesh Singh S/o Late Ramsagar Singh R/o vill - Bikrampur, P.S.- Cheriya
                 Bariyarpur, Distt.- Begusarai

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant        :     Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                                Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State            :     Ms. Usha Kumari 1, Spl.PP
                 For the Informant        :     Mr. Amalendu Shekhar Thakur, Advocate
                                                Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate
                                                Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   19-03-2026                 Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the

                   appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the

                   respondent-State and learned counsel appearing for the

                   informant/Respondent No. 2.

                               2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order

                   dated 10.07.2025 passed in a case registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 103, 61(2), 190 and 191(3) of the

                   B.N.S., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)

                   (va) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

                   (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for grant of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3937 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026
                                             2/4




          bail to the appellant has been rejected.

                       3. The prosecution case, in brief, informant, namely

          Umesh Singh, who is proprietor of A-one Brick Kiln, alleged

          that on 07.01.2025 at about 11-12 PM at night, 7 to 8 unknown

          miscreants, having arms and lathi, came to his brick kiln and

          brutally assaulted the workers who were working in the brick

          kiln and when one Laxman Uraon came to rescue then they shot

          on him due to which he died and his dead body was thrown in

          the north direction of brick kiln. Next day, at about 6 AM,

          informant received a call that the dead body was thrown towards

          north of the brick kiln then the informant called local police

          station then the police official reached there and this appellant

          was identified in CCTV footage. The injured was taken to the

          hospital for treatment. The informant suspects that all the F.I.R.

          named accused persons, including this appellant, are involved in

          the said occurrence.

                       4. It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing

          on behalf of the appellant that appellant is quite innocent and

          has committed no offence. According to F.I.R., informant is not

          an eye witness to the occurrence and appellant has falsely been

          implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Though, this
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3937 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026
                                             3/4




          appellant was seen in the C.C.T.V. footage but during trial, P.W.

          1 and P.W.2 have not named this appellant and P.W. 3 stated that

          he saw three persons, including this appellant, fleeing from the

          place of occurrence and as such, none of them have seen this

          appellant committing the alleged offence. At best, this petitioner

          was only seen fleeing from the place of occurrence. Moreover,

          there is absolutely no allegation of abuse by caste name against

          this appellant and as such, no case under the Scheduled Castes

          and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out

          against this appellant. Appellant is in custody since 19.03.2025.

                       5. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the respondent-State

          and learned counsel for the informant/Respondent No. 2 have

          vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, materials that

          have surfaced during investigation and period of custody, this

          appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 10.07.2025

          passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (POA)

          Act, Begusarai in connection with Nawkothi P.S. Case No. 05 of

          2025 is hereby set aside with respect to this appellant only.

                       7. Accordingly, let the appellant, named above, be
             Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3937 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026
                                                          4/4




                       released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                       thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (POA)

                       Act, Begusarai in connection with Nawkothi P.S. Case No. 05

                       2025.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.