Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

MD.MANAURI MIYA @ MD.MONAWWARversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The High Court upheld the order of the Special Court rejecting the appellant's anticipatory bail.

Summary

The appellant, Md. Manauri Miya, was charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for verbally abusing, assaulting and firing a gun at an informant, injuring her hand and threatening to kill her. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Court under the SC/ST Act. On appeal, the petitioner contended that he was innocent and that the alleged incident was not in public view, thus not attracting liability under the SC/ST Act. The Special Public Prosecutor opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations. The Patna High Court, after considering the nature and seriousness of the accusations, found no ground to interfere with the lower court’s decision and upheld the rejection of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail in view of the charges under the IPC, Arms Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
  • Whether the facts alleged constitute an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
  • Whether the order of the Exclusive Special Court rejecting anticipatory bail was legally erroneous

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • assault
  • attempt to murder
  • Arms Act
  • criminal law
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4755 of 2023
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2023 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Manauri Miya @ Md.Monawwar S/O Md. Kaisar @ Md. Kaisar Miya
                 Resident Of Village- Hafizpur, Karmor, P.S.- Pandarak, District-Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Shobha Devi W/O Late Ramakant Paswan Resident Of Village- Hafizpur
                 Karmor, P.S.- Pandarak, District-Patna

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Ms. Usha Kumari 1, Spl. Public Prosecutor
                                                  Ms. Pragya Kiran, Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocates
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   15-01-2026                 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of

                   appellant, respondent no. 2 and Spl. Public Prosecutor.

                               2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated

                   18.08.2023 passed by learned Exclusive Special Court SC/ST

                   Act, Patna in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 17 of

                   2023, registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, 307, 504, 506 of

                   the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections

                   3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

                   (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for

                   anticipatory bail of appellant has been rejected.

                               3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 30.1.23 at

                   about 1 PM, this appellant verbally abused informant using
              Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4755 of 2023(6) dt.15-01-2026
                                                           2/2




                        casteist slurs and upon objection, appellant assaulted her and

                        fired gunshot which injured her left hand. It is further alleged

                        that the appellant threatened to kill the informant.

                                     4. It is submitted on behalf of appellant that appellant

                        is innocent and has committed no offence. It is not the case of

                        informant that alleged incident occurred within the public view

                        as such, no offence under SC/ST Act is made out.

                                     5. However, learned Spl. Public Prosecutor appearing

                        for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

                                     6. Considering the nature and seriousness of

                        accusation, I do not find any ground to interfere with the order

                        of the learned court below and as such, the appeal, which has

                        been filed for grant of anticipatory bail, is hereby rejected.



                                               (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.