Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Umesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order rejecting anticipatory bail, and directed that bail be granted to the appellants.

Summary

On 28 July 2024, the informant alleged that the appellants, Umesh Sahni and Hitler Kumar, along with others, approached her demanding a ransom of Rs.2,00,000, used caste slurs, assaulted her and her son, and stole jewellery and cash. The Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act rejected their anticipatory bail application. The appellants contended that the incident stemmed from a long‑standing land dispute, that the injuries were minor, and that no public member was present, thus no offence under the SC/ST Act was made out. The State opposed bail, relying on the charges under the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST Act. The Patna High Court, considering the clean antecedents of the appellants and the nature of the injuries, set aside the order rejecting anticipatory bail and directed that bail be granted upon furnishing a bond. Consequently, the appeal was allowed and the appellants were ordered to be released on bail within eight weeks of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the allegations constitute an offence punishable under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the appellants in view of the facts and the nature of injuries.
  • Whether the evidence presented by the prosecution is sufficient to sustain the denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • caste based violence
  • land dispute
  • bail jurisdiction
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4934 of 2024
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2024 Thana- SC/ST District- Munger
                 ======================================================
           1.     Umesh Sahni S/o Bideshi Sahni Resident Of Village- Bariyarpur, Ps-
                  Bariyapur, Distt.- Munger
           2.    Hitlar Kumar S/o Ranjit Sahni R/o vill - Chandan Nagar, P.S. - Khagaria,
                 Distt.- Khagaria, Presently residing at Vill - Bariyarpur, P.S. - Bariyarpur,
                 Distt.- Munger

                                                                                    ... ... Appellant/s
                                                        Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Sunita Devi W/o Ashok Paswan R/o vill - Bariyarpu, P.S. - Bariyarpur,
                 Distt.- Munger

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellants      :        Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Ms. Usha Kumari 1, Spl.PP
                 For the Informant       :        None
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   16-04-2026                 Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants

                   and learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the

                   respondent-State.

                               2. Despite valid service of notice, no body appears on

                   behalf of the informant/Respondent No. 2.

                               3. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order

                   dated 01.10.2024 passed in a case registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2),

                   74, 303(2), 308(3), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections

                   3(1)(i), 3(1)(w), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4934 of 2024(5) dt.16-04-2026
                                             2/4




          Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

          whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of these appellants has

          been rejected.

                       4.       The prosecution case, in brief, is that on

          28.07.2024 at about 8 PM, when informant was returning from

          Bariyarpur, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused

          persons, including these appellants, carrying arms, came to the

          informant, demanded ransom of Rs. 2,00,000/- and also abused

          her with caste based slurs. It is further alleged that upon protest,

          all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these appellants,

          assaulted informant and her son and also snatched gold ring and

          cash from her. It is specifically alleged that Appellant No. 1,

          namely Umesh Sahni, assaulted on the cheek of son of

          informant with butt of pistol and Appellant No. 2, namely Hitler

          Sahni, assaulted informant with danda.

                       5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the appellants that appellants are quite innocent and

          have committed no offence. On account of long standing land

          dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place in

          which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-

          case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these

          appellants, simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4934 of 2024(5) dt.16-04-2026
                                             3/4




          ornamental in order to make the case grave. It is further

          submitted that it is not the case of the prosecution that any

          member of public was present at the place of occurrence and as

          such, no case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

          (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out against these

          appellants. Appellants claim clean antecedents.

                       6. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the respondent-State

          has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellants.

                       7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by these appellants,

          case and counter-case and clean antecedents of the appellants,

          this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 01.10.2024

          passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act)-cum-

          Additional Sessions Judge-I, Munger in connection with A.B.P.

          No. 1409 of 2024 arising out of Munger SC/ST P.S. Case No. 31

          of 2024 is hereby set aside with respect to these appellants only.

                       8. Accordingly, let the appellants, named above, in the

          event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on

          bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act)-cum-Additional Sessions
             Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4934 of 2024(5) dt.16-04-2026
                                                          4/4




                       Judge-I, Munger in connection with Munger SC/ST P.S. Case

                       No. 31 of 2024.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.